Four ways to chat with Keir Starmer’s New York Times

President Trumps open Russian President Vladimir V. Putin sang leaders in Europe for the end of the war in Ukraine. Last summer, the selected summer Minister Keir Starmer’s promise to promise a standard issue to revive the economy and public services has become more than British Prime Minister Keir Starmer.

Now Mr. Starmer, for the Trans-Atlantic Alliance, a fateful moment of world stage. In a few weeks in a few weeks, he led the reaction to Europe’s peace talks with French President Emmanuel Macro. Happened mediation Among the Ukrainian Mr. Trump and President Volodymyr Zelensky. And he Lobbying Mr. Trump not to leave Europe in the mercy of an aggressive Russia.

Here is a series of starmer consisting of recent conversations Held with the New York Times.

Europe must help ensure peaceful solution between Ukraine and Russia.

Prime Minister Trump gladly welcomed the efforts of the war with the wind, and this was the call between Mr. Trump and Mr. Putin, “he nudged a little bit.” However, without solid security arrangements, it will consider any peace agreement to be sensitive to Ukraine’s future waves.

“I do not trust Putin and therefore I get everything he said with some caution,” Mr. Starmer said. “If there are no security arrangements, we know when to be, he will break the deal on time and time.”

According to him, Europe must play a role in ensuring this security. Mr. Starmer dedicated a lot of weeks in many weeks in recent weeks willing coalitionHe will play a role against Russia to protect the peace deal.

Both Britain and France have troops, although no European country has done so openly so far. Mr. Starmer said that the lack of ads is still early in this process, the peace talks are inchoats of an uncertain and unobstructed force with peace talks.

“How do we carry the concept to a plan?” Mr. Starmer said. “If there is a bargain, how do we make a plan we can put in place? It’s what we can’t do, say:” Toward “then scratch our heads.”

It is important to protect the ‘special relationship’ with the United States.

As for the relations between the United Kingdom and the United States, Mr. Starmer complied with a straight policy: no daylight.

“We are not different from our other allies,” he said. “Based on defense, security and intelligence, we mix together in a way that there are no other two countries. It is in our own interests to continue this.”

Mr. Starmer said that he had a relationship with Mr. Trump and gained money so far.

“I met him a few times now,” he said. “I talked to him in numerous cases. I think we have a really good relationship. I believe he wants peace in Ukraine. He believes that he is loyal to NATO.”

Starmer acknowledged the renewed importance of the royal family in Britain’s diplomacy.

Mr starmer has a So secret weapon While continuing this difficult period: the royal family. Last month King Charles gave a letter from III obviously happy Mr. Trump invited him to visit Britain to the state.

“President Trump said about what he wanted to say to his love for his royal family and his late Queen to him,” Mr. Starmer. “This is important because this is something that other countries are looking for.”

After the meeting with Mr. Zelensky with Mr. Zelensky, Mr. Zelensky had a crowded diplomatic dance card in the meeting with Mr. Zelensky. He wrestled with two consecutive Canadian Prime Ministers, Justin Trudeau and Mark Carney and Mr. Trump’s tariffs against Canada and returned calls to be the 51st American state.

“It’s not for me to talk to the royal family,” he said, always careful Mr. Starmer. However, he said, “The Prime Minister of Canada is the Prime Minister, despite the Canadian President of the king.

In a more variable world, it is necessary to increase its protection and security in Britain.

“I still remember when the Berlin wall felt when the wall fell down,” said Starmer, while discussing Europe’s attitude towards protection. “This was the beginning of a new era of democracy and freedom’s values. I think the countries would be occupied again for the rest of my life.”

“Because the peace dividend lasted so long,” the importance of paying for the defense in Europe and defense slipped behind other priorities.

Now, “It has more urgent and relevance to do more to do more,” he said.