Google calls for weakened copyright and export rules in AI policy proposal

Google, Follow the Openai heels, Policy proposal was released In response to the National “AI Action Plan” of the Trump Management. Tech giant AI teaches to provide poor copyright restrictions, as well as balanced export control “Balanced export control”, while providing US export and global work operations. “

“The United States needs an active international economic policy for a lawyer and AI innovation for American values,” he said in a Google document. “It has been a very long time that the AI ​​policy has focused on risks, often incorrect regulation may ignore the cost of innovation, national competition and scientific leadership – it can be a dynamic starting to start under new management.”

One of the more controversial recommendations in Google applies to the use of protected material with IP.

Google claims to be “fair use and text-information exceptions”, the EI development and a scientific innovation related to AI. Like OpenaiThe company is right to ensure the right to this for this and the right of competitors to the public -, including copyrighted information – wants to provide very unlimited information.

“These exceptions are copyrighted for AI teachings,” Write Google “,” Write Google “, avoid a large number of unexpected and long talks during the development or scientific experience.”

Google It was reported to have something Trained a Number of models People, copyrighted information tangled lawyer Before you do it, you are with the owners of the information that blames the company to warn them and compensate. The US courts have still maintained the Fair Use Dokrine AI developers effectively from IP prisoners.

Google also receives the issue at AI Policy Offer Certain export control applied under the Bunden administration“The United States says” Economic competitiveness can disrupt its ability capacity, “said in January with the statements of Google rivals such as Microsoft. that “is confident” that Can be “fully compatible” by the rules.

Important, export rules that want to limit the existence of advanced AI chips, refusing freedom to reliable enterprises looking for large groups of major.

Elsewhere of the proposal, Google calls for “long-term, durable” investments in the only local R & D with the latest federal efforts Reduce costs and eliminate grant prizes. The company has to issue information bases that may be useful for the government’s commercial EU education and financing the financing for Early Sunday for “Early Sunday” for calculations and models.

Pointing to the chaotic regulatory environment created by US state legislation, Google government called on the Federal legislation in the AI, including a comprehensive confidentiality and security framework. In 2025 in two months The number of AI documents waiting in the United States has increased to 781According to an online tracking tool.

Google protests against the US government, as responsibilities of use, as responsible liabilities of the Ai, accepting heavy obligations around the EU systems. In many cases, Google claims that a model is used, and however, it should not be used to use a model, and should not be responsible for abuse.

Historically Google opposes laws like SB 1047 in California clearly put on Before leaving a model, how much the AI ​​drew a developer’s reserve measures and the developers of the cases can be responsible for the damage caused by the model.

“Even if a developer provides a model to direct displacements, the use of surface users will be best placed in the best way to understand the risk of effective risk management, and understand the market monitoring and access.

Google also called the EU, called “excessively broad” and called the US government to oppose the rules of transparency or how to share the secrets of trade or make a concession of guards or jailbreak models.

The growing number of countries and states have adopted laws that require how the AI ​​developers do the systems do. California Ab 2013 AI broadcasts a high-level summary of the Data Staff prepared by the companies prepared by the systems. In the EU, companies, companies, restrictions and model-related risks will have to provide model locators in the EU.