San Francisco (AP) – Google is a decimal monopoly, this time in less than a year, this time, this time, this time, this time, the Internet empire of $ 1.8 trillion is currently wins online marketing technology.
Judge Judge Leonie Brimine is coming to Judge Leonie Brimine in Virginia on Thursday A separate decision in August Google’s names for the search engine, competition and innovation, he used illegally illegally.
After the US Department of Justice, Google targeted the local search engine The first of the President Donald Trump The same agency went after the company’s profitable digital advertising network in 2023 Postee Office of President Joe Biden In 1998, Google attempt to overthrow Google’s capacity to start a silicone valley garage.
Although the antitrest regulators dominate both times, the war has been trying to cancel two monopoly decisions in appeals when Google progresses on a new and high-income technological border artificial intelligence.
The next step is the next step, a punishment phase that will start the end of this year or early next year. Search for the same so-called hearing in the search of the monopoly, on Monday, Washington DC on Monday, lawyers of the Justice Department here will try to convince the US regional judge Suggested required to sell Google to a chrome web browser.
Google, Google’s last 17 years, including search engine and other extensive products and services, including Chrome Browser, YouTube video sites and digital maps around 115-page decision collections.
The system was purchased in 2008 a platform for manipulating the prices of the $ 3.2 billion online advertising specialist of online advertising specialist Dubleclick, California, California and providing vital marketing connection.
Justice department lawyers, Google, websites, as well as advertisers, as well as advertising locations, technology and advertising exchanging technology and advertising exchange technology and advertisements used in the fractions of a month, he said.
After evaluating the evidence presented during a long trial Last year ended before Thanksgiving, Brinkema, this rejected Google’s claims that Google deals with advertisers rejected that the company’s publishers are forced to rely on their network for income.
“For more than a decade, Google has closed the exchange and advertising server and advertising server and advertising server and advertising server and advertising server and advertising that allows Google to build and maintain monopoly power in these two markets.” Brinkemi wrote. “Google has further increased the monopoly power by applying antiquotic policy against customers and eliminates the desired product features.”
Despite this rebuke, Brinkema, Google, Doubleclick or a few years later, after a few years later, after a few years later, he said he did not violate the law.
The Department of Justice “Failed to show that Dubleclick and Admelel Procurement is an anti-procurement,” Brinkema wrote. “These procurements are not enough to make Google’s monopoly power in the neighboring advertising market in the neighboring advertising market, to exclude this monopoly force or protecting this monopoly in Google.”
It can help Google can help go through any attempt to force advertising technology to stop monopoly behavior.
“This is a significant victory in the struggle to monopoly the US Prosecutor General of the US Prosecutor’s Pamela Bondi said in a statement.
The statement said that Google will protest the decision.
“We do not agree with the decision of the court on the publisher’s tools,” said Lee-Anne Mulholland, Vice President for Google Regulatory Affairs. “The publisher has many options and chooses Google because our advertising technological means is simple, affordable and effective.”
Analysts like BMO markets Brian Pitz, Google predicted that the company’s latest failures and its corporate parents, to close about 1% to about $ 151.22 dollars. The Alphabet Fund has been summer so far this year.
Search and on top of advertisements on the failure, Google fights 2023 verdict of the Federal Jury This Android program, which is designed for applications in smartphones equipped with Android program, is also an illegal monopoly.
As in the work of the search monopoly, the Google rejected the allegations of the Justice department. Lawyers, government, Facebook parents claimed based on a market concept of market concept, which appreciated a highly competitive market for meta platforms, Amazon, Microsoft and Comcast.
As drawn in the work of the Justice Department, the market does not include advertisements on market mobile apps, streaming television services or Internet users, but the definition of the government during the opening statement of Google Karen Dunn “Time Capsulu” When the trial began last September.
The lawyers of the Justice Department in court damage the news publishers from the dominance of Google’s dominance. Gannett, the people of the United States and other newspapers, Wall Street magazine and talked about the issues of Wall Street and talked about what they are talking about their talks, was the lack of alternatives of Google’s advertising technology. These companies trust online advertising to finance and make articles for free on the Internet.
Now the government is in the position of trying to dismantle the Byzantine advertising system. The case was not two years ago, the Justice Department during the Biden Administration, Google’s website publishers and advertising sharing technology that the exchange of advertising should be forced to sell its product to sell its product.
Source link
