Physical Address

304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

Greenpeace has to pay the pipeline for $ 660 million on protests, the jury finds a jury


Environmental Group, Dakota Introduction Demolition of Oil Pipeline in the Oil Pipeline Demonstration of more than $ 660 million in the construction of a pipeline

Greenpeace International, Greenpeace International, Greenpeace USA and Foundation’s Greenpeace Fund Inc Inc., guilt, anxiety, civil assassinations and other acts accused the Dalland’s Login-based Netherlands.

Greenpeace is responsible for all count, while others were responsible for some. The debtor’s losses will spread in different quantities on three institutions.

Energy transfer Americans named “Win” “Win” for “Win” “understanding the difference between the right of free exit and violating the law.” “

Greenpeace said that a large award for a large award to the Pipeline Company previously threatened.

After the verdict of a jury of nine people, Greenpeace’s large legal adviser said the group’s work “never stop,” he said.

“Today is a really important message, and we only walk and gather together, and we will understand what our next steps are,” Deepa Padmanabha said to reporters outside the Justice.

A group of people in front of a building in front of a suit
Greenpeace representatives talk to Morton County outside Morton County on Wednesday Manda, Mandon Mandon. Left: Greenpeace USA Temporary Executive Director Sushma Raman; Greenpeace USA, high-level legal adviser Deepa Padmanabha; Greenpeace International General Advice Kristin Casper; Greenpeace USA lawyer Everett Jack Jr; Greenpeace Foundation Inc. Lawyer Matt Kelly; And Greenpeace USA Chief Adviser Jay Meisel. (Jack Dura / Associated Press)

The organization then said that the decision plans to complain.

“The fight against great oil is not over today,” said Greenpeace International General Advice Kristin Casper said. “We know that the law and the truth is on our side.”

Casper, this group will see the transfer of energy in Amsterdam in July, said that last month he will see in a lawsuit.

What were the claims in Greenpeace

The case returns to the protests against the upper part of the reservation of the Pipeline and the Missouri Rock Sioux tribe of the Dakota in 2016 and 2017. Over the years, the tribe opposes a risk for a risk for water supply.

Clock | The referee allows the North Dakota pipeline, but the government is looking for voluntary ‘break’:

The referee allows the North Dakota pipeline, but the government is looking for voluntary ‘break’

As a result of the construction of the oil pipeline near the North Dakota Booking of the Permanent Rock Sioux, the Federal Court said, but the three US government agencies asked to give a voluntary break in a segment, which said there were holy works.

Many state pipelines transport about five percent of the United States’s daily oil production. In mid-2017, oil began to transport.

Energy transfer Lawyer Trey Cox, Greenpeace’nin said a scheme to stop the construction of the pipeline. During the opening statements, Greenpeace claimed that he entered the region, sectarization, organized or led protesters or led protesters or led to the project to stop LEDs.

Lawyers for Greenpeace organizations have no evidence for allegations, and this has nothing to do with the delays of Greenpeace employees, and organizations have nothing to do with construction or refinancing delays.

Details of losses

The cost of the loss is about $ 666.9 million ($ 958 million). The jury, Greenpeace’s large part of the US losses, about $ 404 million ($ 580 million), Greenpeace Fund Inc. and each of the Greenpeace International has to pay about $ 131 million ($ 188 million).

A series of Rolice on a river bank face people in a river, which supports the camera or to the people in a river.
The protesters show that Cannon Ball in Cannon Ball, ND, November 2, 2016 against the expansion of the input pipeline in Dakota in ND. (John L. Mone / Associated Press)

Energy transfer said in a statement: “We gladly express the Greenpeace’s actions to be liable for us, and North Dakota, who has experienced daily aggression and violations that are funded by Greenpeace.”



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *