Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
About four years ago, there was a moment of momentary moment to suddenly capturing the Western military union in Ukraine, which seized the whimsiscal, and sometimes in a whimsy military union.
The Secretary General of the Day was often opened Jens Stoltenberg, the Eastern European country was asked about the proposal that lasted to join the allies.
At this point, Ukraine was waiting for more than a decade for admission.
Like the first signs of a closer storm, the previous spring was a terrible structure of Russian forces on the border.
Stoltenberg, Ukraine’s unchanged NATO, which is connected to NATO, was predicting. (Full statement: I am the question.
It was – perhaps – a sad prescomer.
But Stoltenberg turned it off.
Each nation has the right to choose and choose the unions and associations.
Point – then and now – Ukraine has chosen. He chose one side and graphsed his course. Confidentally, in 2008, he threw a lot with his allies, perhaps the future of incorrect behavior and collective security.
Again, then – as now, Ukraine waited outside the door.
Ukraine in sidelines
At the NATO summit this week, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy – 2022 and 2023, Western leaders were released outside and dining hall for discussion behind the fate of the country.
In justice, Zelenskky, the American President Donald Trump, also spent away with great leaders.
In addition to this meeting, the United States provided the US Patriot missile battery systems.
There was a collective guarantee of additional assistance worth 35 billion euros from European allied countries. Canada – in G7 a week ago – Added $ 4.3 billion.
Summit NATO Secretary General ended with Mark Rutte Rarely with Trump management these daysThe 2023 Vilnius Summit of Ukraine’s way to NATO is still declared, “irreversible”.
Maybe he did not receive the memory of Washington.
It was clear that the summit was adapted for Trump – a short, narrow-oriented agenda aimed at taking allies to show the money to show the money. Ukraine was necessary, but unpleasant, the next thing.
Canada, in 2008 the original sponsor of Ukraine’s membership, went on a desirable way.
“We would prefer us, Canada preferred a special session with Ukraine with NATO,” he said.
CARNEY, when the closed leaders scored several points related to Ukraine, the majority of the majority of the majority of the majority of the collective agenda and announced the majority of something related to other allies concerns. He used the Arctic as an example of something that Zelenskyy could not care about.
Prime Minister’s statements shed light on things that are related to the fundamental division between Europe and the United States (at least this iteration) over Ukraine.
“The United States does not consider Ukraine’s security important for our security and European allies,” he said.
Europeans said: “In the event of Putin’s prevailing in Ukraine or in the absence of Ukrainian sovereign, independent state – they are at risk.”
Clock | Ukraine explains the result of bombing:
Construction worker Valery Mankuta in the Ukrainian capital said he woke up when he woke up when he woke up when he felt a blast to journalists. The explosion was overnight on a night, because Russia has launched another blow to Ukraine.
This risked Trump’s pus in the enthusiasm of Ruthte’s Ukrainian membership proposal.
“They see Ukraine’s need to support our security through NATO. The United States does not only see this way,” he said.
The United States thinks that NATO is NATO. The protection for NATO members and the European allies make them better, “he said. “And Ukraine, this is a failure. It is a war.”
Russia’s red line
Russian President Vladimir Putin, Ukraine’s potential membership in NATO, refused to enter the Western Union of the neighbor, forever, made the main red line of allies.
Nobel Peace Prize was a kind of Nobel Peace Prize and criticized Moscow Verboten – either in NATO or G7.
A month ago, Trump’s ambassador to Ukraine Keith Kellogg said Russia’s concerns on NATO’s East-Early growth.
Bullocks says the former NATO Secretary General Lord George Robertson.
“I had nine meetings with Vladimir Putin as Secretary General,” he said.
“At no point, he did not complain about the expansion of NATO. Not.”
Robertson describes Putin as a “retroactive justification in 2008 to” Putin’s NATO’s neighbors in the nearest interview. – Russia occupied Georgia in 2008).
In the laundering of history, the wrong information is an agreement, which is a recent collision, re-prepared and massacre, Putin and allied leaders, the NATO-Russia Council in 2002 has not agreed in the US President George Wean Jean Chrétien.
“Vladimir Putin, NATO-Russia Founder Act (1997) and the Romertson, which is the guarantee of the territorial integrity of all nations in Europe,” Robertson said. “His signature is with me.”
History and event are burned in his memory.
“On May 20, 2002, the same day he stopped at the press conference, and said that Ukraine is a state, an independent people,” said Robertson.
“And now the same person says that Ukraine is not a nation, and somehow, it must be strongly absorbed in the concept of a new Russian.”
During the interview, the former Secretary General often acknowledged a copy of more than two decades in the suit pocket.
The document for Robertson is an eternal reminder of Putin’s betrayal – perhaps a crown achievement of a crown achievement that has become dusty.
When Ukrainians look at the same piece of paper, they do not see only betrayal and see another whimsical moment in time.
