Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
[ad_1]
Viktor Schwartz, 40 years ago, when New York began the city-centered wine company, of course, he did not expect to face the strongest person in the world.
However, Schwartz and his company vos selections are in a situation in a situation in which the world will have an economic impact, the bidders in the legal battle against Donald Trump tariffs.
“One day, as I would sue the United States President, Schwartz told CBC News. “This was not my goal in life. I just wanted to bring really nice wine to sell people who enjoy them.”
However, Schwartz was aid in a serious legal blow to Trump’s tariff policy on Wednesday, When the court decides The management exceeded the right to apply some of these tariffs and should stop collecting them.
Short-term victory
But the victory was short after the US Federal Court of Appeals provided the urgent action This will allow the leadership to continue tariffs at least temporarily.
Schwartz accepted the return in step.
“This is only part of the process. After this decision (Wednesday), after this process, this process is not like we think we know this process,” he said.
In February, Trump, in 1977 he used the International Emergency Emergency Economic Economic Power Act (IEEPA), Canada, Mexico and China, said that illegal flow and drugs in the US border should be a national emergency and three countries have more work to stop.
Last month, Trump, he also asked IEEPA when he said “mutual” tariffs, such as “mutual” tariffs to resolve the trade balance of trade with other countries. Later, the exports of the countries stopped these tariffs for 90 days to decide to reduce barriers.
The US International Trade Court in New York, the judge, the judge, who was three Hazing power panels, determined that the president had exceeded this action when he called on this action.
The judge arrived in a pair of court. One of them was published on behalf of those who import goods from the countries where five small US enterprises, including 5 small US enterprises, including tariffs targeted. The other court lawsuit was issued by the 12th state of the United States.
Schwartz, when the first decision falls down on Wednesday, the lawyer said that he meant about him until his friend explained him.
“Then I became very annoying, and I knew it was really good for everyone in the country and for all for all of the world trade?” Said.
Tariffs “really is a terrible, terrible effect on what we want to do here.”
Manhattan apartment spouse and of course, a special glass wine, celebrated with a Vermentino from France.
The company where his daughter was working with Chloe, imports wines from 16 countries and distributes to neighboring countries. Schwartz says family operations and family operations in Europe and the United States are managing a family company
Asked to join the case
Schwartz says that I did not receive legal reservations, but Ilya Somin, a constitutional right at George Mason University, was found through a family member of Ilya Somin against tariffs. Schwartz says that you contacted Somin to say what happened in his industry and was very interesting to hear the story of this Somin.
“The long story short, they wanted me to join this work, and as a result, I asked me to be the bidder he led,” he said. “It really developed. I’m a very random bidder here. I didn’t look for this fight.”
Clock | Carney welcomes the sentence that blocks some Trump tariffs:
Prime Minister Mark Carney shows that a US court hit a part of Donald Trump, which is illegal. ‘Three ruling panels include the constitutional body using urgent powers to sweep sweeping over the global goods.
He laughed for the first time he read the legal complaint and the company’s “kind of confusion” under the name of his company.
“Options against Trump. ‘ It was like a dream, “said Schwartz.
“It’s’ WOW, it’s amazing.” ”
Meanwhile, Somin, Somin, Thursday, the decision of the Court of Appeal, but a temporary block said, but a temporary block should be made in connection with the lack of a constant stay, a more permanent stay.
If so, if the higher the Supreme Court opens the Supreme Court, Somin said he was “Guardian Observatory” according to CBC.
He says he didn’t rule on Wednesday. Somin seemed to have the power to apply the tariffs in any country in any country in any country during the request of the referee as soon as possible during oral controversy. “
This, Somin, said he was a “massive power”.
Clock | Investors, Trump Flip-Flops:
The US Trade Court has blocked some tariffs of Donald Trump, stating that the president is frustrated with a new wall prospectus, made fun of the wrong trade policy.
[ad_2]
Source link
