How the Loudest Voices in AI Went From ‘Regulate Us’ to ‘Unleash Us’

On May 16 2023, Sam Altman appeared In front of the Senate Subcommittee. The court’s name was “EU control.” Noting that the session, Altman and Senators, Altman called the EU’s “press moment”, we admitted that the United States needs strong laws to prevent traps. “We think that governments of governments will be critical to reduce the risks of strong models,” he said. Legislators Altman’s every word, how the intelligent laws can allow the EU’s prosperity, but both deputies and AI builders were in the company’s rules that are vital. Altman spoke about the industry that shares his attitude. Battle Master “regulates us!”

Two years later, on May 8 this year, Altman returned to another group of senators. Senators and Altman were still reading the same melodian, but were taken from a different playlist. This court hearing was called “Win in the AI ​​race.” In DC, the word “control” fell in favor and the AI ​​disclosure is not excluded. Instead of defending the risks of foreign institutions, due to the platforms to evaluate the risks or interact with the AI, Ted Cruz, remove obstacles such as the government only “Majorization”. Altman I was with it. The message was no longer “regulating me” but “invested me”. He said he was like the rules of reproduction Adopted by the European Union or recently a bill Vetoed in California would be “disastrous”. “We need a space to innovate and move quickly,” he said. Security guardians may be necessary, approved, but it was necessary to attract “sensitive adjustment that does not slow us down.”

What happened? For something, Panicky’s moment passed by Chatgpt and It was clear This congress was not going to move quickly in AI. However, the biggest development Donald Trump took back the White House and hit the brakes in the administration of the Biden administration. AI regulation Trump doctrine is doubtful with doubts that the TRUP supporter of Trump Techno Optimistic Manifesto This was the form of murder in the true sense of this AI regulation, “EU’s slow down the slowdown will cost.” President JD Vance these priorities announced these priorities at the international meeting in Paris in February. “I’m not here … Talk about the AI ​​security, which is the name of the conference a few years ago,” he said. “We believe that the excessive regulation of the AI ​​sector can kill the transformative industry, and we will make an effort to promote the growth of growth.” The administration appeared later AI Action Plan “To increase the position of America as AI strength and prevent weightless requirements that prevent the private sector innovation.”

Two enemies appeared in this movement. The first is the European Union accepting a Regulation mode This requires transparency and accountability from major AI companies. The White House approach, as there are AI businesses, and this approach.

But the biggest Bogeyman is Chinese. It is not considered that the United States should be described as the most popular perspective, regulations, or Altman and Cruz “light touch”. It comes from a theory known as some of the cause “Hard flight” AI models, the AI ​​models can reach a striking point that develops lightening, and started the beginning of a BagicalGity known as AGI. “If you get the first one, the man will not be able to catch you” Past Google CEO Eric Schmidt says“You” (SCHMIDT was talking about China as a leader in the open source.) Schmidt is one of the highest votes on this possible future. However, the White House is probably less interested in loneliness than in classical economic competition.

The fear of China, which is ahead of the AI, is the main driver of US policy, and the security will be cursed. The party line is even trying to fill the vacuum of inaction with their laws to individual states. The tax break version of the home given only the home of Megabill Megabill Mandated moratorium In any state-level AI legislation It’s been 10 years. This is an eternity in terms of AI progress. .