Inheritance Tax Referendum Spooks Switzerland Super Rich

Unlock the editor’s digestion free

FT editor Roula Khalaf, chooses his favorite stories in this weekly newsletter.

The lawyers and bankers in Switzerland are a referendum of a referendum for 50 percent inherited referendum before a competent referendum.

The alpine nation is related to popular voting in November, in November, more valuable inheritance and gifts from SFF50mn ($ 61 million). Unlike existing Conaln tasks to be applied, the offer does not include the release of the offer for spouses or direct generation.

Great voting comes after a hasty in a hurry to perform global assets of the wealthy residents of non-wealthy residents in the UK reverse. Meanwhile, Jurisdictions like Dubai and Italy increased their efforts to attract the rich.

“Switzerland was harmful in terms of attracting people who left the UK. The timing was terrible,” said Georgia, advice to the private customers of the Staiger Law. “It did not stop the arrival of everyone, but more Italy, Greece, United Arab Emirates and elsewhere.”

In 2022, the new tax was offered as a way to raise the climate crisis in 2022. According to the Swiss law, such proposals are supported by 100,000 signatures, go public.

“The whole country should vote as an offer of unnecessary unnecessary proposal proposal,” said Frédéric Rochat, which manages Geneva Based Lombard Oyier’s partner. “This is the simple fact that is available.”

Peter Spuhler, who owns the richest people of the Rolling Stock Giant Stadler and Switzerland, said he can “a disaster for Switzerland”, he said he can hand over the successors to SFF2bn.

Prospects for the risks of the Swiss in recent years in recent years in recent years rule.

“When it comes to Switzerland’s gifts and inheritance, there was always a perfect environment. We have several family companies we present, and if they offer, the BDO tax and legal manager in Zurich.

The new Levy will be superior to other jurisdictions between the legacy of their legacy or between 8 percent, or between Italy between Dubai and Hong Kong.

Business Lobby Group Group GROUP EveronsiTeese, the initiative of this week, “Switzerland’s position as a reliable and stable job,” he said.

As the voting approaches, some people have already left and others decide to move to the country.

RoChat, Lombard Oyier’s families who saw the Swiss-based families, and the foreign customers decided not to move to the country, because the “extremely harmful” proposal created uncertainty before the voting.

Another Zurich-based private banker, if a client does not pass the offer, because after a few years, there are uncertainty around, whether he is on the head of another, “he said,” he said.

However, other banks still said that many rich people still transfer money to Switzerland and indefinite periods.

“We see a very large result everywhere in the given moment of global variability,” he said, said a third executive in a special bank Americans Especially, under the leadership of Trump, he made efforts to transfer money to the country.

Christian Kälin, Henley and Partners, a london-based advice in a London-based consultant, “said the idea that Switzerland does not share the idea of ​​damaging.

“Some saw some people waiting to see, yes,” he said. “But the people we are sincerely are smart and they will not easily introduce Switzerland.”

As the country’s executive department, the country’s executive department, the upper and lower houses of the practice organization, experts gave their chances of success in the historical referendum of citizens issued in November 30. To pass, the majority of the majority of the population and require the majority of 26 cantons of the country.

However, RoChat will be reconsidered after a few years, which has been losing or lost by a small margin of the proposal, or lost or lost. “Such an extreme cluster (this probability) should be voted by putting in bed for 20 years.”