Iran will continue all the legitimate ways to look for the attackers Israeli-Iran conflict

The international legal order loses its effectiveness when faced with the combination of hegemonic powers, as well as universal accepting norms. If such practices remain silent, there is a risk that the order will lose the purpose of the groundbreak: justice, protection of peace and protection of peoples sovereignty.

The United States and Israel’s attack on Iran, including scientists and intellectuals, the bombings of nuclear facilities, approved by ASIA, are an example of illegal, medical, media and public infrastructure, illegal, unilateral action. This is a mistake and is the exact violation of the main norms of international law.

In this context, the principle of state responsibility should be applied to the principle of liability for illegal actions. This principle was approved by the International Legal Commission on the Liability of States on international misconceptions in 2001 and referring to international courts and courts and courts.

According to the rules, the commission of an illegal action, such as applying illegal force – it is a violation of an international obligation and leads to a responsible situation to ensure complete and effective restoration for the damage.

In the case of illegal acts committed by the United States and Israel, the legal responsibility goes beyond ordinary violations. These actions have only violated ordinary international law, but also the highest ranking norms in the international law hierarchy violated the violated character standards. The principle of aggression banning between them is the basis and everyone in a compulsory basis. It is not allowed to allow violations to respond to all members of the international association to protect all members of the international community to protect all members of the international community.

There are at least two relevant legal precedentes that may lead the state responsibility and the application of the repair principle in Iran.

In 1981, the Security Council of the United Nations adopted 487 resolutions in response to Israel’s attack on Iraq’s nuclear facilities. The act of aggression described the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), “IAEA),” IAEA), “IAEA),” IAEA), the “IAEA) foundation” International Atomic Energy Agency). completely recognized.

Article 6 “The responsibility of Iraq’s responsibility for Israel has the right to be eligible for adaptation for the destruction. The aggressor compensates for damage to the resulting damage, the resolution also provides a clear legitimate precedent to return similar cases.

Thus, the use of the US and Israeli attacks on state declarations confirming and the application of the principles and provisions of the 487 resolution, not only appropriate and necessary, but also severely substantiated.

Another relevant document is 692 resolutions adopted in 1991 and created the United Nations Compensation Commission (UNMC) after Iraq’s Kuwait’s occupation. The Commission was instructed to process the requirements for repayment of losses and losses caused by the occupation.

Demonstrated the capacity of international mechanisms to establish UNCC, identifying victims, identifying, damaging damage and practical compensation – to determine an open model for government responsibility in illegal aggression.

The precedent provides a strong legal and institutional basis to confirm the rights of the Iranian people. Therefore, the establishment of the UN and Iran as an international commission for re-compensation is both compliant and necessary.

The UN General Assembly or other officials should be approved by the UN agencies and approved, such a commission, a comprehensive assessment of the damage caused by the illegal and aggressive actions of the United States and the Zionist regime.

The establishment of reparative mechanisms – independent commissions will be a meaningful contribution to the principled response to the restoration of confidence in the global legal system and the normalization of the impunity in the global law system.

Iran has another avenue for justice for illegal attacks. The IAEA, which facilitates the IAEA, the United States and the Israeli aggression commission, published biased and politically motivated news on the Iranian nuclear program and violated the principle of neutrality.

This places a position to ask for an agency’s reduction and demand in Article 17 of the IAEA Safeguguals in Iran. As a state that harms the open negligence of the agency, Iran has the right to complete repairs for all material and moral damage caused to nuclear facilities and researchers.

In this context, the IAEA accountability, along with aggressive states, is an important element of Iran’s extensive strategy to protect international legal accountability. Relying on well-known, legal and compulsory international mechanisms, Iran will determine the rights of its people in each forum.

As a result, the recent responsibility for the recent crimes of the aggression of the aggression of the aggression, the United States and Israel, which help them and those who help them, IAEA. All states and international organizations are undeniable in implementing effective legal measures to prevent such crimes.

In general, the international community must respond strongly. In the face of rape and atrocities, the form of silence, delay or any complications will take a blessed riot on the principle of state accountability in the international law.

Following the reporting, Iran will run out of all existing sources and will not be comfortable until the people of their people are fully recognized and back in an adequate way. Until justice is fully achieved, it will continue to seek responsibility for these crimes at both local and internationally and at the international level.

The views shown in this article are unique and definitely reflect the editorial position of Gazir.