Is That Painting a Lost Masterpiece or a Fraud? Let’s Ask AI

There are artificial intelligence So far appealed as a bogeyman In cultural circles: Software put into operation The number of people who have died for writers and translators and pictures created by AI, illustrators and graphic designers.

Where there is still a corner of high culture AI He plays a role as a hero, traditional hero-art professionals and conservatives, but when it comes to conservative, but also the warriors and misfortunes, add a strong, binding weapon to his arsenal. AI already Unusual Based on the analysis of a painting of a painting, to recognize and approve the work of an artist.

The objective analysis of the AI ​​threw a key to this traditional hierarchy. If an algorithm can determine the authorship of an artwork in a statistical probability, where does it release the old guards of art historians built on their subjective practices? In fact, the AI ​​will never replace bunnoisseurs, such as the use of Rails and Carbon Dating for decades and carbon dating. It is simply the latest in a line of high-tech tools to help with verification.

A good AI, a database developed by human art historians to develop his knowledge of a artist’s style must “feed” and comment on the results of human art historians. In November 2024, the leading AI company, was the case, Art recognitionRembrandt published an analysis Polish rider-Men the confused scientists and caused many controversy because of how much evidence of many evidence was painted by Rembrandt. AI clearly adapted what the parts of the connoisseur of the paintings were positive by his students and who attracted the most enthusiastic resumption. The scientific approach is especially compulsory when approving the expert opinion.

We find harsh scientific data is more compelling than personal opinionEven when this idea comes from someone who looks like a specialist. The so-called “CSI Effect“Jurors describe DNA’s evidence of DNA even more persuasive than the testimony of witnesses. But the expert opinion (witnesses), the evidence and scientific tests (CSI) are all you can get.

However, the owner of a business that is funny at first sight is a smooth firm, with the task of collecting court evidence to support a preferred attribute, which is very funny?

Lost and found

In 2016, a fatty oil in a market market in Minnesota and a fatty oil painting less than $ 50. Now the owners suggest that It can be lost van goghand so it would be worth millions. (An assessment offers $ 15 million.) The answer was “nah” for anyone who works with the history of the least running eyelids and art. The painting is harsh and rude with the Dutch artist Oeuvre defining an impasto and a rhythmic brush. The worst, brought a signature: Slimar. Again, this suspicious painting became the center of a highly distributed battle for the originality, one collided with scientific analysis, market forces and desirable thinking.

The owners of Elimar Van Gogh are now on the fact that when it comes to transporting in the arts circles A group of art called LMI International. They invest a lot of In receiving experts to say they want to hear: he said it was actually an original van gogh. This is where the work is confused. The world of art authentication is not a flat job. Unlike tough sciences, the probabilities of art history, connoisseurs and competitive expert reviews. It is also very important, managed by financial enthusiasm. If the painting is considered a real, his value skyrokrocci. In this case, in this situation, in this case, along with none of the minibus, it was very valuable in a market market in a market market in a market market, it was a little or less of a derivative of someone who is a derivative. In the cats, this imbalance caused a dangerous trend: not to determine the originality of experts, but to confirm professionals.