Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
[ad_1]
The Federal Referee asks Apple to confirm the presentation of Fortnite in the US App Store or to return to court to explain the legal basis for why it does not do it.
New quotedUS District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers confirms the court Epic Games’ last moveApple requires you to confirm Fortnite to distribute in the App Store.
A clear annoyed judge asks Apple to show a legal reputation that Apple has claimed that “Apple ignores the order of this court.” Gonzalez Rogers also show that Apple should return to court to explain that the situation is not resolved.
“Apple is able to solve this issue without briefing or hearing.”
Singing between lines, the new document requires the name of the apple official, Gonzalez Rogers shows that there is no you are not above the accusations of disrespect to not comply with the court’s order.
This follows the judge’s decision burning the judge’s judge Apple to try to leave the court’s orders and accused Tech’s swearing.
After winner The right to include links to external payment mechanisms in its application, Epic games re-sent Fortnite to the US App Store. But Apple told the game manufacturer decided not to take action Epic Games Presentation After the rules of the ninth circuit, Apple’s request to be partially staying in order. (In other words, Apple said that there is no need to confirm the application until the court process apply are performed exactly.)
Epic Games on Friday presented an action to force The court to apply the order taking the decision of Apple.
The most recent legal threat, the creators of the app, the app creators app fighting a one-year court on a one-year court on App Store’s right to the App Store’s right to connect with an external payment options without paying a commission. Apple, first appeals to the court’s decision in the court’s decision, except for the app store’s rules, but again, 27% commission collected in alternative purchases below 30%. Apple should also use the “scare screens” who warns consumers while clicking to shop outside the app store.
In a great victory for the creators, Gonzalez Rogers was a “deliberate violation” in connection with an anticotic price and commission allowed to appear to Fortnite to return to Apple’s app store. But Apple sat in a week in a week, nor did not confirm the publication of the game, nor did his lawyers respond.
The next happening may be important for Apple, because other global markets can inspire similar legal or regulation.
Apple was a Victor in the original antitrest case of the epic as the court declared that it was not a monopolist. But Epic games won in an area When Gonzalez wants to use its website for an in-app purchases for a developer, virtual goods or subscriptions, when you accept iPhone users enter alternative payment options.
Apple after the decision Updated Its app store is policy for applications, including US and applications Spotify, Amazon Burnand Patriseon Quickly roll new versions of their apps to take advantage of new functionality.
Epic games refused to comment. Apple did not respond to a request for comment.
[ad_2]
Source link
