Judge Rules AI Companies Can Use Some Copyrighted Works to Fuel Their Sludge

This week, the Federal Referee has a great victory, and puts a legitimate precedent to loot copyrighted materials to potentially cultivate large language models.

A large AI company supported by Amazon, an anthropic in a legal battle with a group of writers and journalists SUPPORTED SUMMER COMPANY TO And the company’s flagship chatbo was blamed using his works to prepare Claude. Legitimacy of the entire work model of the AI ​​industry It was dependent on the question Whether there is a kosher to protect copyrighted by the Internet with a copyright rights and then make an algorithm to produce the “original” text. Anthropic and writers continued to be used Use the exhibition and therefore is legal. This week, the federal judge, who chaired the lawsuit, was partially agreed.

In His judgmentAlsup claimed that the authors had not violated the LLM without the permission of the authors, because he did not violate anti-anthropical copyright materials, because his work was in his eyes, original. He claimed that the company’s algorithms were …

“… The creative elements of a particular work, even an authentic expressive style of expression, even if any of the unique expressions, did any of the most modern classics read and then read the mixture of the best articles?

Alsup’s power is a little way from the trial of writers accusing an inventive for “strip cultural” anthropy, human expression and corporate profit. This decision is the opinion of only one judge, but critics can easily set a precedent for other legal decisions in the country. AI sued the companies with creativity with similar grounds.

The decision of the ALSUP can sign a signal to the AI ​​industry, it is not complete for anthropic. It announced that there is a particular way, where there is a particular way, which is a certain path where Anthropik, a certain path of anthropic, which can be illegal and requires a separate test, which is a particular test for anthropic. “We will be tried for pirate copies used to create damage to the Central Library of Anthrop and the result,” Alsup said. “This anthropic then took a copy of a book [that] Earlier, there will be no liability for theft from the Internet, but it can affect the degree of legal damage. “

When I reached a comment by Gizmodo, the anthropic gave the following statement: “Court” recognizes that the LLMS uses the work to prepare and transformed in a magnificent way. ‘ Copyright creativity and scientific progress, ‘Anthropic’s LLMS, or not repeating or repeating or repeating work – only a hard corner and create something different.’ “

Lead a few prominent cases, including Uber, DOORDASH and WAYMO. Recently, Alsup ordered Trump management To restore thousands of firing test workers Those who pushed by Elon Musk by the DOGE initiative.