Physical Address

304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

Kansas ignored the law that canceled a pregnant woman’s vital choices


Three women and two doctors are fighting to block a Kansas Act This makes a pregnant medical directive in advance of a pregnant woman’s treatment.

Bidders – Currently, those who are pregnant – complicate the constitution of a paragraph that allows pregnant women to accept health in order to accept or give up health instructions, if pregnant women are healthy or end patient.

Patient Bidders Emma Vernon, Abigail Ottaway and Laura Stratton and Laureates Michele Bennett and LineLley Holman The claim filed Thursday. This claims that the dam is violating the right to freedom of freedom of freedom of privacy, privacy, equal treatment and speech freedom of speech.

CDC eliminates the recommendation of the Covid vaccination for healthy children, pregnant mothers

Pregnant women rubbing the stomach with oil

Two doctors and three women are sued to prevent a Kansas law that makes medical decisions invalid. (Idle)

The pregnant lawyer, a pregnant health worker, pregnant and a terminal condition, stating that if the child is full-time and born, will significantly worsen the quality of life and is important. “

The court says that his directive did not work in the same respect to the same respect, which ended the instructions due to pregnancy. “

There are laws that allow people to write advantages in the medical care they want to receive their health decisions. Nine states have paragraphs to be invalid Pregnant woman Advance Directive.

Pregnant woman in a doctor

Bidders claim that the law violated the right to personal autonomy, privacy, equal treatment and freedom of speech. (Idle)

Doctors joined the lawsuit that the law requires them to provide pregnant patients with a Low care standard In addition to other patients, civil and criminal courts, as well as professional fines, open them.

The court said that doctors have a basic health-medical principle for determining what treatment of doctors and treat the patient without informing consent and violate both medical ethics and law. “

A couple are angry with a new mother mate and to choose a friend and barbecue

Chris kobach

The defendants in the trial, Kansas President Kris Kobach (pictures), Kansas State Healing Art President Richard Bradbury and Douglas district Lawyer Dakota Loomis. (AP Photo / John Hanna)

Click here to get FOX News app

“Again, the Kansas law clearly stated his decisions in the life of the lifetimes, he forced pregnant patients to force other patients to take a lower care than any patients.” “This requires legal treatment without clarifying the legal treatment, no clarity to explain if they are subjected to the vocational and professional results to obtain the legitimate, criminal and professional results.”

The defendants in the trial, Kansas President Kris Kobach, Kansas State Healing President Richard Bradbury and Douglas district lawyer Dakota Loomis.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *