Law professors side with authors battling Meta in AI copyright case

There is a group of professors specializing in the right to copyright An amicus gave brief information Meta Llama AI models claim that they are educated by Unauthorized LLA AI models.

The North District Court of California called the US District Court on Friday in the US District Court on Friday “a respondent to the courts of human authors than human authors.”

“The use of copyright work to make generative models is not ‘transformation’, because it is not necessary to use work to teach people to teach human authors [authors’] “Briefly read”, not “transformative”, because the goal is to create works of competing in the same markets – a goal that is used by a profit company such as meta, is that it is used, “” Trading. “

Case, cadrey v. Meta, Richard Kadrey, Sarah Silverman and the company, including the company’s emails, claimed that the company’s copyright information from this eBooks was hiding the alleged violations. Meta, this time claimed that he not only evaluated education as a fair use, but the authors should not be released because they did not sue.

This month agoAlthough the US District Judge Vince Chabria has dismissed, he allowed him to start work. In his government, Chabria, copyright violations claimed “enough concrete injury to clarity” and the authors’ adequate in the intentionally “intentionally made the CMI” [copyright management information] to hide copyright infringement. “

The courts are at the moment in a number of AI copyright claims weigh New York Times’ suit against Openai.