Meta tells the Oversight Board it isn’t removing the word ‘transgenderism’ from its hate speech rules

If everyone hopes that the control board will provide a type of methane Meta just clarified the places where he stopped. Company He refused to take any reasonable steps to change the official response and rules for the criticism of the Board.

The Supervisory Board previously “criticized the January policies”“And the term” transgenderism “wrote” concerned “about the decision to use his term” transgenderism ” Community standards. The company’s policy announced by Mark Zuckerberg in January before the start of the President Donald Trump, now allows people to claim that the LGBTQ people are mentally ill.

“We allow mental illness or abnormalities, as a political and religious negotiations of transgenderism and homosexuality, the decision to leave the public aggression of transgender women as a decision to leave the public aggression of transgender women. He recommended to make the word “transgenderism.” “To be legitimatured by the rules, Meta should try to attract a neutral framework.”

The word has a long association with discriminations and frosts, human rights groups. Human Rights Campaign The term “social and scientifically invalid” and “Trans trans activists are often used to protect the transvergious people.” Glaad also contains “A framework for a person’s transcerator’s identity” concept “or ‘ideology’ is a basic personality, which can be discussed, and therefore substantiates the transgender, non-intentional and gender non-conformative, and the violence of discretion and real-world violence.”

In response, the meta officials still said, “they evaluate a feasibility study,” he said. The company said, “The terminology will review the way to update,” he said, “Sometimes it is considered insulting to some of us,”

Meta also refused to allow the other three recommendations to other recommendations. The Board “How can political and execution-content updates can affect the rights of LGBSE + people, including the height of these populations, especially these risks to reduce these risks and regular reports on its work.

Meta users were usually assigned to appoint other persons who can report insulting and aggression on their behalf and have made progress to reduce mistakes when people report violent and aggression. Meta said these proposals “evaluate the expediency”.

Meta’s response is of concerned questions about how much the Ostabitli independent control board can affect. Zuckerberg said he created a control board to take the decisions of the META control board to make a policy decisions. Earlier, Social Network, as the rules for the suspension of Donald Trump and the rules for celebrities and politicians, asked for help from the board to help in large decisions. However, Zuckerberg’s hate speech protection and trench third party inspection of the third party took the plate as a surprise.

Meta has always been free to review the recommendations of the control board, but it has allowed it to influence more controversial policy. But it seems like it can change. Zuckerberg’s return words and trench third party truth inspection took the board as a surprise. And now the company’s board has little interest to deal with these changes critical.