New Study Backs Controversial Claim of 23,000-Year-Old Human Footprints in New Mexico

Researchers working in New Mexico in 2021 were published paper He helped things that are one of the most controversial topics in American archeology. The research describes human traces of white sandy national Park Following 23,000 to 21,000 years ago, they make them the oldest traces in North America. This is protesting against long-term beliefs first North Americans were a people named Clovis called Clovis, found near New Mexico, near New Mexico, which is near the end of the last ice age.

Because the footprints could not come directly, the researchers evaluated the age of these trace fossils – 23,000 to 21,000 years, radio with radiocarbon with radiocarbon and were found in layers under the tracks. Critics continue to claim that ancient seeds do not accurately represent the age of the site, this was newly published in this week Science advances Provides additional support to original finds. Like this, the seeds of the water plant Ruppia Cirrhosa In this dispute, they give another look at the center stage.

“İlk amerikalıların gəlişi məsələsi çoxdan, çoxdan mübahisəli idi və ağ qumların mövqeyindən olan rekordu Tanışlıqların doğruluğuna yönəlmiş xeyli mübahisəni nəzərə alaraq, Arizona Arizona Arizona Arizona Arizona Arizona Arxeoloq Universiteti və 2021 kağızının həmmüəllifi olan Geoloq Vance Holliday. “Bu sənəd, yeni əlaqəli tarixlərlə müstəqil stratiqrafik araşdırmanın nəticələrini, əsasən ilkin tanışlığı offers from the Third RadioBarbon source. “

In short, Holliday and colleagues from radio-dated new organic material, including Ruppia seeds, new geological sheets related to footprints. The team’s new age, the new age assessment is between 23,000 years ago, 23,000 years ago, 23,000 years ago. In one of the research areas, radiocarbon dates of the Sediment with Organic Sedges are closely aligned with the preliminary assessment of the gypsum, about 22,400 years ago and 20,700 years ago and more closely.

If the footprints have been 23,000 years, people have a maximum of maximum maximum of the ice, when the ice has created an obstacle to the North Atlantic North Atlantic 20,000 years ago. Even if footprints are crackdown At the age of 17,000, it will suggest that people arrived in North America until 11,700 years ago until the end of about 11,700 years ago.

“This is a paradigm in the way we think about the peopling and human evolution,” Nicholas Felstead, “Nicholas Felstead, the researcher of the University of Swansea, only 14,000 years ago, only 14,000 years ago.” Early people, probably northern By crossing massive ice sheets of the hemisphere or perhaps the Pacific Ocean or Atlantic Oceans, along the Pacific Coast or Pacific Coast, reached America to America.

According to Karen Moreno, the University of Austris in Austria, new studies, new research, adapt to the evidence from South American sites such as Verde, PilamukoPedra Furada and Arroyo del Vizcaino. The evidence of these sites, if not 30,000 years ago, 16,000 and 20,000 years ago, 20,000 to 20,000 years and 20,000 years ago, 20,000 years ago offer a person’s presence. “Of course, South American arguments are not regardless, and I am noticing that North American finally pointed to the supporters of our research in the South,” Moreno, who did not participate in the new study, told Gizmodo.

One learn Published in April, calls the question again, again the reliability of radiocarabo from the White Sand Center. The main point of the disputes is recognized as a hard water effect. A geochaeologist, a geochaeologist, a geochaeologist, a geochaeologist, a geochaeologist, a geochaeologist, a geochaeologist, a geochaeologist, who has an effect of water plants, carbon, David Rachal, Vieja Consulting and April Research, explained to gizmodo.

In groundwater, carbon consists of very old-soluble limestone, which seems older than they actually met radiocarbon. The leader explained that the harsh water effect was “baked” until both Ruppia seeds and other organic materials from mud.

“According to their model, this shape is inside the site, which is in the site, which is under the same conditions, is very good, and then the effect of hard water is not a problem,” he said. The model of Rachal and his colleague shows that the plant was not grown on the site, but washed on the opposite. “The plant has a zero proof of growing inside the site. If the site does not grow up, there is still a hard water effect.” Like this, any other examples that meet the dates of Ruppia are also problematic.

Without reviewing the hard water effect, the 23,000-year-old footprints still raise questions than answering, Ben Potterin, Alaska Fairbanks University’s anthropologist who is not involved in the work. That is because they have not left the known trace for 10,000 years. “We need real human production works to understand the identities, behavior and potential fate of these populations.”

As a result, today’s research represents the latest volley in the discussions of the first Americans. The ball is once again in the opposite party court and I am sure that their answer will not last long.