Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
New York State MPs The bill has passed On Thursday, the reason is to contribute to the death or injury of more than 100 people, including Google, Google and Antropin, or more than $ 1 billion.
The passage of the law of the establishment represents a profit for the AI security movement Lost land in recent years Silicone Valley and Trump management as the speed and innovation is a priority. Security supporter Geoffrey Hinton and AI research pioneer Yoshua Bengio, including the Nobel Prize winner, fought with the removal act. The law must be procured, the bill will determine the legal forced transparency standards for American Border AI laboratories.
The law has the same provisions and goals California’s controversial AI security Bill, SB 1047, the resulting vetoed. However, the Bill sponsor, New York State Senator Andrew Mounardes, Techcrund’s innovations in an interview, in an interview with the startup or academic researchers, said in a TechCrunch.
“The faster this technology is developing,” the speed of speed is developing, “the window is shrinking quickly,” he said. “People who know [AI] The best says these risks are incredibly likely […] This is concerned. “
The growing act is also directed to the Governor of New York Governor Kathy Hochul, who can sign a bill to sign a law, send back or completely veto.
If the signature is signed, New York’s AI Security Bill will demand comprehensive security and security reports to the world’s largest AI laboratory. The bill should happen, for example, stealing an AI model about AI laboratories, such as AI model behavior or bad actors. If technical companies live in accordance with these standards, the growing act strengthens the Prosecutor General of New York to bring up to $ 30 million.
Aring ACT aims to regulate the world’s largest companies – like California (like Openai and Google) or Chinese (like DeepSeek and Alibaba). Bill’s transparency requirements are used in computational sources of AI more than $ 100 million (more than any existing AI model today) and are presented to New York residents.
Nathan Calvin, this bill and AI model developments in SB 1047 do not require or provide companies that do not require or organize companies that are post-environmental damage to the important losses in their models.
However, Silicon Valley’s New York’s AI Security Draft Project, New York State Assemblemember and Reton Bores’s joint sponsor with Alex Borsor with a joint sponsor. Bores, industrial resistance was not surprising, but the growth act claimed that the innovation of technological companies did not restrict in any way.
Anthropic, safety oriented AI Laboratory He called on the Federal Transparency Standards for AI companies At the beginning of this month, he did not reach an official position in the bill, the co-founder Jack Clark said Friday post in X. However, Clark said that the more widespread movement of the greater growth was said to have a risk for “small companies”.
Asked for the criticism of Anthrop, the State Senator told Techcrunch that this said the “missed the sign” that the bill did not appeal to small companies.
Openai, Google and Meta, TechCrunch’s application did not meet.
Another general criticism of Artice is to offer the most advanced AI models in the New York province of AI model developers. This was a similar criticism against SB 1047, and this is what the continent is played mainly in Europe due to tough rules for technology.
Assemblyember Bores Techcrunch said that the growth act is relatively light to the regulatory burden, and therefore should not demand the suspension of technical companies in New York products. Given that New York is the third largest GDP in the United States, it is not something that most companies are going out of the state.
“I do not want a possible political pet, but I am very convinced that there is no economic reason for those who do not exist in New York,” said AssEplymember Borres.
