Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Mark Zuckerberg’s defense was engaged in a critical part of the defense of the most serious Antitrest Square, with technology giant and tiktok.
In the martyrdom for three days, the billionaire founder said that the video platform given by Chinese parents in the US Federal Court in Washington has become a great competitor.
His opponent had a handle: To tell the claims of the US Federal Trade Commission Meta It was illegally, proven, proved that Zuckerberg will be able to achieve more results because of any commercial threat of work.
Losing the case and split the meta $ 1.5TN group and be forced to close Instagram and WhatsApp applications – the result Zuckerberg He promised to “go to the battle” before. The boiler and this will soon win a decisive victory over a regulator, which has great technology in the eyes of the retail giant.
The court comes after Zuckerberg, first of all. According to a person familiar with the issue, the FTC demanded $ 30 billion as a potential settlement; Meta Lowballed, after $ 450 million, set up to $ 1 billion to $ 1 billion for $ 1 billion. The parties then decided to go to court.
In the FTC suit, the meta is a claim that the opponents of the meta worked to eliminate the opponents, including a “systematic strategy”, including in 2012 and 2012 and $ 19 billion and $ 19 billion and $ 19 billion and $ 19 billion.
This week, FTC lawyers Zuckerberg’s applications were presented as a threat, including a domestic and disturbing emails. In 2012, Zuckerberg also said that the Instagram agreement could help “neutralize the opponent” and “to use M & A to build a competitive moat around our mobile and advertisements.”
However, this type of tactics can only save a monopoly if the FTC can first maintain a monopoly, it can prove that some antitrust experts will be more difficult. This one point Zuckerberg and former Meta Chief Operating Director Sheryl Sandberg, Tiktok’s explosive growth emphasized to serve more than 1 billion users worldwide.
“It’s not a great look to say and thinks in the past, but if there is no thing – if you have any monopoly, the head of the monopoly and Hart now,”
“Zuckerberg and Sandberg have done a good job that explains that this is a current reality – (this) is a substitute for grabbing and META’s grip and most users’ minds.”
In antitrust problems, FTC should also prove that it will usually be a monopolistic monopoly, which is generally available for monopolists. The agency, which offers the meta for free, claims that consumers are exposed to a broken user experience due to foods filled with ads and poor privacy protection.
The main problem for FTC, with Mota’s dominance – partially dominant Judge James Boasberg’s “Personal Social Network” market, which is not included in the “Private Social Network” market.
According to the Wall Street Journal, a person reported for the first time by the Wall Street Journal, said that Methan’s Lowball offer to the FTC’s work is how weak. FTC refused to comment.
“We did not explain why we did not explain why the FTC did not reach the tribute to the FTK to be able to reach the court to be able to reach the court by the 17-year-old American.
However, some experts claim that all weeks will be able to accept the arguments of the BOASBERG, FTC.
“The court is clearly open to the possibility of a personal social network market,” said Kenneth Dintzer, Antitrest and Competition Group in Crowell and Mins. The BoAsberg appealed to FTC in 2024, noting that “other applications to show that other applications do not have reasonable substitutes” for friends and family sharing.
Zuckerberg, in response to Tiktok meteoric rise, pointing to the group in a hurry to prepare reels and rejected this concept in court. Zuckerberg, Tiktok’s offer “Probably there was the highest competitive threat to Instagram and Facebook,” Zuckerberg said.
Meta boss, pointing out to the sharp jump in users, and claimed to accelerate the growth and accelerate the growth of Instagram to speed up the growth.
FTC opposes Zuckerberg with a 2013 email ahead of WhatsApp deal.
After proposing to teach Sandberg, Catan’s Siton’s Sethlers, Zuckerberg in 2012, said: “(Facebook) Messenger, Instagram has increased the fact that we should buy $ 1 billion.
“The determination of Mark’s testimony is noted today, as these days are intended in the real time, during ten years ago, it was reported to be a great legal adviser for inhison, anti-monopoly Non-Profit American Economic Fiber.
Perhaps the most striking evidence came in the form of a Zuckerberg e-mail in 2018 The instagram is considered spinning – Referring to the full threat of danger from the antitrust application he faces today.
“Calls to enlarge large technological companies”, “There is a meaningless chance to compeller for the next five-10 years and maybe we may have to bend WhatsApp.”
