Openai and Jony Ive, ‘blamed’ burying ‘to start his opponent

CEO of the head of the Open Openai and the former Apple design, the leader of the former Apple design, Sir Jony Ive, $ 6.4 billion in device enterprises, accused the company “burying” after discussing potential cooperation.

Jason Rugolo, the founder and former Google Executor Jason Rugolo, Io, Openai was “root” in partnership with ive to create new AI Supply products. Both companies have been negotiating with the beginning of the beginning.

“This is the story of a corporate aggression of large companies trying to bury small companies,” said Rugologist. “If we didn’t win a restriction order, this announcement can kill us very well.”

The trademark argument comes in a month after the open one month after the open Get the start of the Ivin device In a bet on smartphone alternatives as a dominant device to access AI.

Weekend, Open After a US federal judge, a US filled by a US federal judge then deleted a blog post and short video. Openai and Loverfrom, Ivi’s design firm, deliberately rejected a brand breach or misconception.

Rugolo, in March in March in March, Openai Chief Executive President Sam Altman’a.

“I would like to convince the Joo to Openai and to convince the idea of ​​this October this October in October (product).

The Two Had A Video Call On March 26, And A Follow-Up Demonstration WAS Set Up For May 1 With OpenaI’s Vice-President Of Product, Peter Welinder and io Executive And Former Top Apple Designer Tang Tan, According to People Familiar With The Meetings.

On May 23, a few days after the IO deal, Rugologist sent Altman to the beginning of the start of the “a little sensitive and exposed and exposed and exposed, David and Goliath Style”.

He asked Altman to be a “serious and optimistic” about a potential purchase of a potential.

Altman sent the email to WelderRinder for the thoughts that respond internally.

Rugolo FT explicitly “Openai” decision made me completely blind: An announcement of something similar in the same name … They know what they do. “

Openai said: “This is an unreasonable trademark argument and a job about stolen ideas or technology.

Iyo, who escaped from Google’s Moonshot Laboratory in 2021, prepared AI headphones called “Jous One”. “Audio Computers”, spoken voice assistants have joined a set of applications.

This month, this month, this month, Iyo, Rugologist, Openai and the team from his team until May, explained in detail.

According to the e-mails announced in the suit, several team members wanted to try the ILO device. Tan, Weldaner and Evans Hankey – the leader of the former Apple Design head joined in IV, in court, he met in a way in a way to the Jou.

“They talked about buying our company,” said Rugologist. “They got everything, until the program works as he worked. I trust them foolishly because we thought we were working together and worked hard.”

The meetings came three years after the initial period of the contacts. In April 2022, IOO, Altman’s Private Investment Foundation Apollo Projects and Loverfrom team member and former Pinterest co-founder Evan Sharp said he met with Ryan Cohen. Both were invested in time.

In court, Altman said in March this year, he sent “blue outside” in March this year in March this year, sending an e-mail to “blue” in March this year. Altman said Rugolo was passed to Rugolo to “assess any opportunities for cooperation” from Rugolo.

In the trial, Tan, Rugolo said that a friend of a friend refused to review the company’s intellectual proposal and the rugologist “came out for cash.”

The court’s claims proposed to sell the company for $ 200 million with the Rugologist’s rugologist and “increasing the name of the IO, who is trying to compel the name with his company”, offered to sell for $ 200 million.

The Rugologist said the statement was “100 percent incorrect”, but could result in the misunderstanding of the transaction conditions.

Rugolo said he was trying to raise new finances this year, because 20,000 devices seemed for a limited start of the device, but IO announcement has caused the discussions.

IO products, Openai, Altman and Ive filed a suit of the suit, “not offering goods or services for at least a year,” defense, IO’s first product “(“) the first product “(“) has not been an ear hanging device. “

In the case, it is scheduled for January 2028, will determine that the products carrying the IO brand for October this year will be banned.