Ousted FTC Commissioners Sue Trump Over Firings

Rebecka Kelly Kelly Kelly Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya, two democratic commissions fired by President Donald Trump in the beginning of this month, without a special reason To sue Donald Trump and FTC leadership over the carvings. Because the lawsuit is related to independent institutions, the proceeds to a potential demonstration of the presidential body.

The massacre and bed, demonstrates democracy, represented by a non-profit anti-authoritarian organization, wants to restore the role of a refund and commission. But more than that, they hope to defend successfully Humphrey’s Impray V. United StatesA 90-year-old court court could not be removed by the judge approved by the FTC commissioners.

Bedoya told Gizmodo that he had received the e-mail that tells him his fire while his daughter’s gymnastics class. “What is emergency about it is no reason,” he said. In 1935, the FTC charter returned by the Supreme Court, the president is possible for one of the three reasons only for one reasons: the dismissal, the indifference or duty to work.

None of them were given in the dismissal of the bedo or the massacre. Instead, the announcements, FTC reported that the Traditional Service was “inconsistent” with the Trump administration’s priorities.

The reason for the reason for the Trump Office, the cause of the Humphrey’s executor v. To make a decision in the United States that can open the door to the extraction of other commissars in the United States and other independent agencies.

“The congress of the Commissioner fired on fire and engages in the congress of its power, the President or Democratic can use it to punish the enemies and rewards of these powers.” The results are not abstract. They are not theoretical. “

Davidson explained that FTC was part of a part of the independent institutions created by the congress, all prepared in a similar way, theoretical, commissioners should be removed from the unreasonable removal.

Bedoya said he did not happen next to him, that the purpose of the leadership to fire him and the massacre can monitor the President’s FTC. Humphrey’s executor specifically applies to the FTC, so it serves as a logical point of access to the law to attack the protection of commissarians. But there is an impact outside the agency.

“Here is the main thing, although it is not us in this language.” “If the President may violate the 90-year-old Norman in the American law system, it is not just important to us [at the FTC]. Federal Reserve, Securities and Exchange Commission, important for any number of other agencies. “

“I realized that it was not just trying to take us out. They try to break the precedent for everyone,” he said. As Davidson pointed out, there is also an effect for federal reserve and other institutions.

“If the president’s logic is accepted and it is not a key basis to differentiate the federal reserve, if he can fire the FTC members,” Davidson said. “This will be able to do the president’s historically allocative commissars in insulation and independence.” In the case of the Fed, Davidson said: “The president will be able to manage the direct money policy in the way that may have short-term political benefits for the president, but in which the American people can have long-term destructive results.”

The project is combined as a guide to the leadership of the Conservative Heritage Foundation prepared by the Conservative Heritage Foundation, prepared by the Conservative Heritage Foundation, prepared by the Conservative Heritage Book, in a difficult difficulty. “The next conservative leadership should officially accept the position of Humphrey’s executor violating the allocation of the constitution” document States who describe the law as “renewed for reviewing and maybe more often”.

Trump management, other appointed persons in the agency – also, including the Member of the National Labor Relations Council, was restored after the actions of Trump administration struck unlawfully By the Federal Judge, Although Trump Management complainant the decision. However, the fire of the FTC commissions is still the most direct attack on Humphrey’s executive, and this is to obtain the Supreme Court to revise the Protection of the Supreme Court.

Most likely, at least a few sympathetic justice, the problem should reach the highest court. Decision on Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in 2020, Justice Clarence Thomas write According to him, the decision on Humphrey’s executive poses a direct threat to our constitutional structure, and the freedom of the American people. ” Justice Neil Gorsuch joined this opinion.

In the meantime, the FTC, one of the organizations in the protection of consumers, prevented and still hinders something that can still take. Currently, there are only two commissions, which is generally generally: Administrator Ferguson and Commissioner Melissa Holyoak, both Republicans.

Davidson explained that three commissions needed for a quorum, which is necessary for a quorum where the agency can do. However, the rest of the commissives, the remaining commissives, warned the rules of information on how to apply the pre-procedure rules of privacy and how to apply to Amazon.

The more importantly, Bedo says that he opened fire, the president’s probability that the results of this work can make effective decisions. “In a world in a world, which we can be removed for any reason for any reason, it does not matter what commissarians think. “They can obey and stay or they can’t do or see what happens.”