‘People’s humiliation’ over Epstein connections that threaten marriage were exposed

Unlock the editor’s digestion free

FT editor Roula Khalaf, chooses his favorite stories in this weekly newsletter.

Thursday, Thursday, “People’s humiliation” on Thursday, the Bank’s London trial, “People’s Degradation”, he said that the former Barclays boss is at risk.

The American banker is allegedly allegedly allowed to mislead the lawsuit against the deceased ban and a subtle ban and a fine ban and a fined ban and a fines to be wrong.

68-year-old Staley, this week, this week, Jeffrey Epstein’s employees of Jeffrey Epstein said he had sex in an apartment belonging to the dead financer.

Lawyer Robert Smith KC was a “hasty concern” after lawyer operating for the financial behavior of the Banker’s legal team.

“I passed the Atlantic to be with this court,” Staley, later under the examination of the financial behavior. “I could stay at home.”

“I was honest because I risk my marriage in the last few days.”

In 2023, FCA, who prohibited the occupation of high-end tasks in the finance of England, stressed that he did not blame the banker to “be unknown to Epste’s crime.

Instead of the guard, Staley lowed his relations with his pkinies and was not sincere enough with officials.

However, Smith said that “Mr. Staley’s degradation” and FCA had to implement FCA “on a sexual match in Manhattan. “This question was damaged when asked,” he said.

Leigh-Ann Mulcahy KC, on Wednesday to Staley, “Epstein’s 66th Street in East 66th Street” Epstein’s brother’s apartment “” “Yes” responded.

The court said that Staley said in a deposit of the United States in a separate trial in connection with the trial, and he said he did not know that Epstein’s brother was apartment. Epstein did not know about the match, Staley told the court.

Mulcahy said the question has solved the “as much as I can and as sensitive.” “We refute the proposal without notice.”

He said that FCA did not want to occupy the confidentiality of Staley, but he did not want to establish relations between him and to establish relations between him and said that they had close personal relations.

Davy centers, in a letter in 2019, the two statements made to regulators, Staley was approved. The bank, the CEO, “There was nothing close to” and Staley’s latest relations with him were joined by the “Good” British Bank of Staley.

The banker asked on Thursday to Contact on Epstein, using FCA as a “vehicle”, the banker continued to indirectly after the Cooker of Barclays.

Mulcahy, who asked Staley about Barclays’s letter, “He put the only one with all the facts, the only man who was the only person who could be a position, isn’t you?”

Staley said he watched the instructions of Barclaysın legal adviser to determine the “contact” as “contact” on “physical existence”.

After taking the work of Barclays, he said, “he cut the relationship” and insisted that his daughter did not act.