‘Pigs, wait for you to serve!’ Jake Paul, his lawyers Chavez Jr. Appeared after the pot

Jake Paul Post-Chavez Jr. converts his victory into a complete exploded legal performance. In Anaheim Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. After earning up to 12-1, after gaining the boring, clear points, there are zero patience for anyone who calls a joke in Paul. Now he and the manager lashed with defamation threats and looks more hopeless than dominant.

Paul – Chavez: Piers Morgan is in trouble?

TV Host Piers left two barbs in Morgan X:

‘Thursday, there was a better struggle with Thursday Thursday.
‘Boys hung their pockets with $$$$ hives – But this bored of boring is killed boxing against the scene *** opposed to old warriors.’

A few days ago, Paul, Morgan Morgan’a was only a seated for an anchor-branded ‘fat A **’ brand, before completing the interview.

Jake Paul’s Chavez Jr. Legal threats after victory

‘For years, it has slip it as only those who hate them “, and I asked my team to go after anyone who lied about my boxing career. Wait to serve pigs, ‘Paul sounds on social media.

Manager Nakisa Budarian even stacked with a tough language:

‘This claim is unfounded and irresponsible. Yesterday night, Jr., Jr., was the 10 cruise weight of official judges and 10 cruise in the 10th of the California State Sports Commission. No structure / rigging – just a hard work and a legitimate victory. Otherwise, it is almost not the integrity of the sport, and the MVP, Jake Paul and the commission causes reputable damage. Enough enough. We will investigate all the options responsible for those who spread such intentional and harmful lies, including legal measures. ‘

Now even podcasters and bloggers are sweating. Paul’s team, does each tweet, watch the article that dares to question the post and legality? They warned the requirements of sutspoenas, sediments and damage so that they can bury small places in legal payments.

Defamation Drilling Gas: Paul should prove what

Under the California law, the bidder should indicate the expression in question to dominate the slander suit:

1. Conveyed a confirmed fact (not pure feedback)

2. What a lie

3. Has been published to others

4. Has damaged influential

Because Jake Paul is a public figure, they must prove that critics are false, or that the statements of the suspects require serious proofs that require serious proofs or proof of obvious evidence.

It’s hard to see this as anything other than a PR panic. Instead of not negotiations, Paul’s lawyers are armored. Will this legitimate blitz silence critics or strengthen the play? Definition of something: Jake Paul’s next battle can not be in the rim, but in a courtroom. “Haters”, warns yourself.