Poll Finds That 75% of Scientists Are Thinking About Leaving the U.S.

The nature survey of more than 1,000 scientists revealed that 75% of them think that the Trump leadership is considered to leave the United States for uncertainties of federal and university financing.

Since the beginning of the second Trump duration, it has led to the efficiency of universities and the federal agency and the efficiency of the federal agency, the country’s ability to prevent scientific discovery.

In the last survey, an oasis for scientists, Nobel Prize winners, Nobel Prize winners, Nobel Prize winners, Niels Bohr and Enrico Fermi, Niels Bohr and Enrico Fermi, in the last survey Flocked to the United States When the fascist governments rise to Europe in the early 20th century. As the final survey shows, the cooling effect may cause brain drain Researchers are looking for green grazing elsewhere among areas.

By natureNumbers who want to leave were more higher than early researchers in their careers, for example, as doctoral students and graduateurs. As shown in the request, 690 (79.4%) 548 (79.4%) of postports and 340 (75%) decided to 255 (75%). “It was among the best options for moving to Europe and Canada,” he says.

Many researchers He spoke with nature He said they did not want to leave the United States, but the relationship’s relations would have better opportunities for scientific research abroad.

Aix Marseille University of France at the beginning of this month gossip In the United States, many dozens of scientists responded to a call to the Americans who wanted to leave the country a safe port. Stating that the researchers were interested in organizations, including Stanford, Yale, NASA, Others, among others.

In the second Trump leadership, science goals are firm in their crosshairs. Since January, the leadership was reported to leave thousands of federal workers in the agency Institute of National Standards and Technology (Nist), Food and Drug Department (FDA), National Ocean and Atmospheric Department (Noaa) and National Park Service (NPS), and financing along a wider cunning of an institution and Applications.

To accept the best intentions

Now you can relax yourself from optimistic mussings. The government’s directives pronounced the efficiency of these institutions on the effectiveness of these institutions, experts talking to Gizmodo and the risk of eliminating progress in the house and abroad.

But some cuts are made in accordance with Project 2025a conservative action seeking aggressively cut About the environmental protection in the name of freedom and personal freedoms. Thus, although some shallons are driven from under the bottom line, they are also in LockStep with the ideological framework of the department.

This month is the Trump management Given the cutting financing Efforts to prevent internal HIV – returned to the reliable agenda

Changes in financing changes, cultural shifts called by the administration, especially the enthusiasm of the White House tear down Diversity, capital and existing programs and language (DEI), “woke up”, become a lightning bar in conservative circles such as a boogeyman representing the agenda.

Last week, Follow NASA First he said NASA was the “dei sanitary staff” Graphic novels removed He explained the story of the first woman to walk the first woman on the month’s website. No woman did not go to any woman, although Artemis missions even though this in a bit If this is an agency priority.

If the United States wants to protect its neck as a scientific discovery, he must notify that they have the opportunity to build their careers of bright and buds and become a leader in their fields. During the last few months, the Trump management expelled them from this concept, and it will continue on the agenda, will continue to steam.