Privacy-focused app maker Proton sues Apple over alleged anticompetitive practices and fees

Proton, a privacy-oriented software provider of Preon Mail, Proton Calendar, Proton Drive and other applications, The apple has suedApple claims antiqueotic experiments in the App Store. In the new case, the proton, the iPhone manufacturer’s smartphone, application distribution and application of application payment processing is holding a monopoly. It also compares Apple’s fees by calling tariffs in Internet trading, “artificial and optional.”

Looking for changes in the suit, App Store and money damage, Proton will be forgiven to organizations that fight for democracy and human rights.

Court damsSubmitted in the northern region of California, is part of a larger classroom activity suit against Apple. Proton says it is connected to other developers, including Group of Korean DevelopersThose who are also in court.

The costume is the latest to appear in Apple’s Choke Houte’s mobile application market.

Apple is followed by another annual war between epic games and apples earned The absence of a monopoly was announcedappointed a precedent for a new claim to argue against. But in this case, the judge Apple concluded that the app developers should allow the connection to These sales offer an alternative payment mechanisms without charging a commission. (Apple is still struggling to apply to this issue.)

Proton’s work gets a different angle. Referring to the epic box, the evidence proved that Apple has made such a profit in the App Store, it proved that the App Store has made such a great profit to support the storage of the App Store.

Proton, in the same way, takes the issue with Apple’s policies around payments. Apple emphasizes how many customers do their talk to their customers how many customers talk about their appointment on the Internet discounts. In addition, applications supporting the Payment System of Apple, are at risk of removal from the application store.

Arguments around payments affect how the system works, and how difficult it is to manage payments and subscriptions throughout the rules of Apple. For example, the company Explained at a blog post Customers who improve their accounts on the Internet are unable to reduce iOS devices with a poor customer experience.

Proton also claims that the calendar application cannot be defined as a standard, Although iOS allows users to change Standards for other applications such as browsers, emails, phone calls, messaging and more. And notes that it was restricted from the rear processing of the proton driver, but not iCloud.

It should be noted that the Proton’s case is aimed at the first distribution point with the Apple App Store, a tool used by dictatorships to silence free speech. On this front, Apple points to all applications that are removed to delete laws in markets in markets like Russia and China. As this decision was threatened by the implementation of the implementation of IOS developers, proton, VPN, because he claimed that “opening censored websites.”

“Apple’s software distributions in iOS devices create a lack of monopoly control, consumers, enterprises and society as a whole,” Antihisar laws are inevitably caused by monopoly status. In the case of oligarchic technological giants, this abuse has a wide effect for society and it is important for the future of the Internet, it is now applied. “

We have reached Apple for comments and did not hear back immediately.