Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Five wicket defeat in the first test of India’s first test of the Britain has given mass questions over the choice of crushing team and all eyes now ravindra jadeja. Despite Bowling 47 in both shots, Ravindra Jadeja returned with only one wicket for the absence of the Spin selection that threatens India’s last day.
The spinner of the left arm was expected to exploit the rough patches created in the zone of the left side, but were ineffective for most match tests array Opening against England. Only in the final session Cadeja said he could get out of work Ben Stokes.
Greg Chappell blames Headingley’s Headingley defeat
But then it was damaged as the UK wrench Ben Duckett He had already taken the game from India. To make everything worse, Jasprit Burmrah spent a day and gone without wicking, refused the Indian bowling attack when the rocks were followed by the Indian bowling attack.
Daily dose cricket!
Also read: Jasprit Burmah Out, Shardul Thakur, as India summed up the 2nd test against England
Well, Birmingham, who started on July 2, ahead of the second test, the legendary Australian cricket Greg Chappell blamed India’s comprehensive junction. The former Indian head coach, a little bat, warned the habits to choose a little injured bowlers in English.
Ravindra Jadeja is not a frontal moral in English: Greg Chappell
Chappell should play as a support spinner, not lead, if the Ravindra cadeja is in the team for the fight mainly. He believes that if India wanted to survive in the test series, the bowling firepower should prevent the power of the bowling behind the firepower.
Greg Chappell wrote in the column for EspnCricinfo, “he said.
Also read: BTSI, Gautam Gambhir’s statement on the future of Horror show in India’s tests
Greg Chappell calls for India’s ‘insurance’ strategy, bold choice calls
In addition, the former hindistic coach criticized the team’s approach to collecting part-time bowlers to strengthen the pelvis. Chappell said that this “insurance” policy, especially in the UK, when the team needs 20 wickets in the United Kingdom, it did not help this “insurance” policy.
Aussie Great, pointed to the choice of Charul Thakur in the first test, where only 16 more expenses were expensive and collected two wickets. India proposed to choose the best six warriors that can hit the run, and the bowling attack should be chosen as a purely ability.
Indian voters now under pressure?
Chappell explained: “I should be chosen as insurance in an additional batter, upper order sediments, an additional batter from Bortls.
He also called on national voters to show courage in collecting courageous compounds as the risk of players. Chappell, “Selectors are now under pressure. If the warriors and bowlers should be ready to take risks for runs and tights, they should also take courage to make bold decisions.”
