Read the juiciest bits from the Apple-Epic court ruling

Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers Pissed in Apple. Indeed, indeed Pissed off.

Rogers’s newly broadcast 80-page decision took Apple and heads to the commission to oppose the courts of the court Fortnite Maker Original case with epic games. Although Apple wins this round in this round, Apple did not decide that Apple did an anticompretitive way in a specific area: Apple decides to pay other ways to pay outside their payment platform.

The judge should be able to communicate with other ways to shop through the applications of developers, so they could process payments through their website and payment systems. Thus, the developers had to be able to pay 30% of Apple’s commission in in-app purchases.

Apple made it even more heavy for any developer who chooses this option. This can only be added to 27% to 27% for foreign purchases and “Protecting Screens” was added only 3% discount on Apple, this method can be taken into account.

As a result, Apple, his reputation, related to the Community of the IOS Developer and maintained the business model of the Revenue App Store in a way that its well-standing in the eyes of the law.

In the decision of Rogers, it is clear that Apple is quite enough to have enough tactics and is full of juicy tidbits.

Apple responded to the authorities of the court: “We will definitely agree with the decision. We will follow the court’s order and apply.”

If you don’t have time to read all 80 pages yourself, we rolled some of the best bits below.

The judge calls on the German trying to spend the original orders

“Apple’s sensorism was answered for Exidy. He would not see through the revealed cover (the proof of the proof of 2024). “

The judge accuses German more antique and swearing

“Apple’s statements in court, modern work documents, contemporary work documents, and the most antique options in each turn, the fact that the truth is the financial president, Alex novel, explicitly lied.”

“Play cook”: CEO Tim Cook Cook to listen to the recommendations of Judge CFO

“Internal, Phillip Schiller, Apple’s command, but they ignored the COOK, instead, instead, instead, the General Financial Officer Luca Maestri and his financial group allowed him to convince him to others.

…

“Mr. Schiller did not defend for a commission, Mr. Maestri, Mr. Maestra, who closed Mr. Holy, was Mr. Kukun’s tie.”

(Does everyone notice the Maestri’s Apple doesn’t come?)

“It’s an order that is not a conversation”: The judge says Apple is to follow now

“This is not a conversation, as Apple does not hinder the ability to communicate with users, not to do the court’s decision, not a court decision. A new commission in off-app purchases.”

The judge says Apple has postponed the trial to protect his earnings

“Apple was engaged in tactics to postpone the trial. The court finished the amount of the delay in the amount.”

“As a result, epic and apple hired three special master to review Apple’s privilege claims after the revision of Apple. (See

…

“The court sanctions on this issue in this regard, sanctions on this issue, sanctions on this issue in this regard, sanctions on this issue to postpone the termination process of Apple’s lawyer-customer privileges and the decision-making process.

Apple hidden decision-making from the court

“In most configuration, after the Purchase of the Apple Platform, the Apple Platform can use the applicant, according to the 27% commission’s website, a user has any ‘digital goods and services that took place on a developer’s website Payment for transactions … To an external website … … Apple decided to reveal the decision-making process only in 2025 in the second trial court. “

…

“Apple, as a project Michigan, on December 9, 2021 (DKT. 841 (841 in 841 (841), Apple’s compliance efforts.”

Apple knew that it was not suitable for this

“Despite the fact that the court’s examination was investigating the landscape, this issue will be a commission on June 2023, and if there would be a commission on knowledge and consideration of these issues, it was not known until 2025.”

Judge, and Alex says Rome swear

“Mr. Rome was replaced by the financial president, financial president, explicit and open lies. So far, this is so far, which can be compared to evaluate the cost of alternative payment solutions to facilitate the developers.”

…

“Mr. Roman did not stop there. He said that until January 16, 2024, the duty of the duty to be issued to Apple’s related procurement:

Q. And I get that Apple decided to pay 27 percent for purchases before January 16, 2024?

A. The decision was made that day.

S. As of January 16, 2024, do you have any idea what duty of the fee for Apple’s related purchases?

A. It’s right. “

“Another lie. On the contrary to modern business documents, the main components of the Apple plan, including 27% commission, were determined in July 2023.

Neither Apple nor advice, now it is adjusted, now open, lies. Although he or she had difficulty withdrawing his testimony or to make him difficult, he wanted to cause another statement of the court. Thus, Apple will be held to accept lies and distortions into this court. “

Apple also frightened the screens of fear

“Apple has posted a warning message called the” Scary Screen “to avoid using third-party payment options.

…

“The screen on the right is called ‘sheet’ of the ‘sheet’ capturing the full screen after a user clicked an external
Link. Moving from left to right, the user’s warning level increases. Again, Apple has chosen the most antique choice, ie the full screen seizes. “

…

“Again, Apple decided to select ‘more evil’ to include the name of the most antiqueotic choice, ie the development of the development. All this was hidden from the court and was not discovered by the May 2024.”

“Several developers have been signed for the Link Law program (external purchase links).”

“As of May 2024, the app store applied for the program has not received Apple’s app to purchase app for the app, and it has not been purchasing the app, and the development of developers will not be able to benefit from the right of links and adopting prices. Apple has tried to mislead here. “

The court thinks that Apple has broken the letter and spirit of the

“In the first place, a number of other times, even in this and other times, and in this and other times, the literally, a number of 180-page order, which is the letter of any court.

…

“In short, the apple behavior does not justify: it is not computed with the text of the language, this language requires intense and suspicious interpretation, which requires a 180-page instructions and 91-page feedback.

The court says the requirements for link transactions are not justified

“Apple is justification (above mentioned) for these requirements.

The court leads Apple to contempt

“Apple’s behavior breaks his command. The inconsistency was far from the technical or de Minimis.

…

“Apple has chosen that this court is strange not to meet this court. He thought that this court would endure such an extraordinary, and the cover was worse.”