Reforms lose vetting criteria for UK candidates

Unlock the editor’s digestion free

FT editor Roula Khalaf, chooses his favorite stories in this weekly newsletter.

Nigel Farage’s reform presented Looser Vetting criteria for new candidates, even if one of the deputies of one of the deputies has caused fresh disputes, and the investigation has occurred in connection with Covenant loans.

The party presented a new “common sense” candidate candidate, which is designed for “more proportional” and the party’s reputation and freedom of the party has a better balance.

An email sent to party members on Friday and said, “We accept this as an empty slate. If you have never failed, it will be re-applied in accordance with new standards.”

A large party figure confirmed that despite the coverage of a change in the party’s vetting system, despite the coverage of one of five Reform MPs elected last year.

Jacob McMurdock, who was elected in July, Sunday, several hours ago a few hours ago, released his claims to borrow tens of thousands before the government’s leap.

The newspaper raised the questions about the fact that the companies in question will receive enough income to meet the criteria for such loans, lending money to borrow money to make money to small and medium-sized businesses.

Answering questions about questions on Monday, Farage said that McMurdock was not the party leader in the moment of the party and therefore there was no “apology” for the vetting procedure.

“I can’t apologize for the vetting process for this year, for the previous ones.”

The new vetting system, former staff and members are a large professional driver who violates some of the partners of the party, the former party chair fired by dozens of former staff and members from the harsh standards applied by ZIA Yusuf.

Yusuf appeared last month before returning to reform in a different role after 48 hours. David Bull Yusuf, the former doctor and TV presenter, replaced the chairman of the party.

Labor, “This is further waterproofing,” the recent disputes around the party’s selected representatives of the party’s existing representatives of the party, “the field is coming to water standards.”

Although reforms in England have promised a vetting approach to vetting in front of the local elections in May, a few members of the new parliament have been suspended or excluded.

A member of a parliament in Doncaster was “unacceptable” online comments, and the other was suspended from the election due to “a number of concerns” after a month.

The reform said in the United Kingdom: “The reform remains the highest possible level of vething procedure. We are eager to have the highest standards for any potential candidate.

“We have made some small pinches in our old policy, and thus encouraged members to re-apply.”