Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Facebook and Cambridge Analytica will start against more than seven years after a privacy scandal in connection with consulting firm, $ 8 billion, US class operations and other meta board members.
Bidders led by Amalgamated Bank Inc., Wilmington, DEL, DEL in DEL, the collection of Facebook users’ data was in violation of the 2012 contract with the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
This is the claim of an investor that Mota has hit the Supreme Court. Nine justice heard arguments after a few weeks after a few weeks after a shift after a few weeks after a few weeks later. allows the work to move forward.
There is a look at how the work is on and what you are waiting for:
Cambridge Analytica, revised
In 2018, the verses of the information from the Ten Millions of Facebook Users, the verses obtained by Cambridge Analytica, occurred in a partial whistlemlower. NOW-Defunct Political Consultant company, the Republican candidate defeated by Donald Trump, the candidate for the candidate Ted Cruz worked and then worked for a TRUMP during the successful 2016 presidential campaign.
Cambridge Analytica’s investors include Trump Ally Steve Bannon and Robert Mercer, Reclusive billionaire After the first support cruz, Trump agreed to support the campaign.
Cambridge Analytica, the information about the users that meet the Facebook quiz application, this is your friends, as well as your friends.
Zuckerberg acknowledged the “basic violation of trust” in the Facebook part.
“We have a responsibility to protect your information and if we do not know if we do not deserve to serve you,” he said in early 2018.
The scandal for Facebook costs
FTC Facebook fined $ 5 billion After the Cambridge Analytica scandal, the company said he violated the 2012 contract with FTC to protect the user information. That year, Facebook Reached $ 100 million With an exchange commission to mislead US securities and investors.
Facebook in 2022 The claim of US class activities has been resolved Taking users for $ 725 million without accepting mistakes.
On his website, the company has invested billions of dollars to protect the user confidentiality since 2019.
Who will testify?
The court, former Chief Operating Director Sheryl Sandberg, Enterprise Capital and Board members Peter Thiel, Palit Thiel, Peter Thiel, Peter Thiel and Scissors Hastings, who are the founder of the former board.
Jeffrey Zients, White House Chief of General Staff Joe Biden and a meta director, which will start in May 2018, is expected to be one of the first witnesses of the judiciary of the judiciary in front of the judiciary of the Delaware Chancery Court Kathaleen McCormick.
The lawyer for the suspects who denied the allegations, refused to comment on Reuters.
What do shareholders want?
Shareholders want the defendants to reset the meta for FTC subtle and other legal expenses, which will exceed $ 8 billion.
In court documents, the claims were “excessive” and the evidence of the court was the victim of Facebook’s FOOCE FOCTS and Facebook’s deception of Facebook Analytica.
In addition to the privacy claims in the center of the meta case, Zuckerberg’s Cambridge Analytics Assembly claims that the scandal will be reduced and selling Facebook shares to at least $ 1 billion.
The accused said that he did not provide information from Zuckerberg and uses a trading plan that eliminates the sale control and a share plan designed to protect the incider trading.
Plaintiff lawyers also provide information about the main problems related to the costume using Sandberg and ZENTS’s personal email and not to automatically turn off the range Despite being told to protect their records.
McCormick is expected to rule for responsibility and damage a few months after the court closed.
What happened elsewhere?
Given that Facebook will reach global, the scandal was given to various types of sues in the world.
Canadian classroom activities caused by Cambridge Analytica violation rejected in A number of provincial jurisdiction.
Last month, the Supreme Court of Canada agreed to announce the arguments to protect the parent’s personal information and the meaningful consent and electronic documents (PIPEDA) Report of the Privacy Commission in 2019 272 Canadian, at risk of about 622,000 Canadian, 272 Canadian loaded the above quiz application.
Facebook’s results and a federal court in 2023 that a user agreed to inform an application to an application, which ends the responsibilities of protecting tasks under Pipeda. The Federal Court of Appeal was unanimously ruled last year.
In the UK, Facebook was fined a maximum of £ 500,000 ($ 921,000 CDN) to violate the laws of data protection laws.
Meta settled at the end of last year After the office of the Australian Information Commissioner, the country’s privacy laws were violated for $ 50 million for $ 50 million.
What was the political impact of Cambridge Analytica?
The Democrats destroyed the verses in 2018, and the political influence fell down by many specialists.
A Nature Magazine Investigation “Proof of the independent influence of Cambridge Analytica’s independent influence is not available” and “There is no evidence that Cambridge Analytica has placed psychographic models while working for the Trump campaign.”
Tufts University Specialist in Massachusetts, The statement of the US SenateMost likely, many Facebook users like the approach to extensive-based robokls.
“No evidence was clearly indicated on the information or targeting of the firm’s profiling or efforts to be effective,” he authored the author of the book Eitan Hersh, the author of the book Hack to voters: How Campaigns accept voters.
The British Blog, who brought a crux loss to Trump, was more ditch, “Cambridge Analytica’s Flashy Data Science team, a friend with a friend with a thousand dollars.”
