RIP to These NASA X Accounts, as U.S. Science Falls Off a Cliff

NASA ASCHING At least 23 The X accounts (SMD) managed by the Directorate of the Agency’s Science Mission Directorate, wanted to “strategically reduce” digital trail. The action comes after President Donald Trump’s offered financing cut can kill numerous research programs.

Nasa put into operation More than 400 social media scores, 300 belong SMD. It is fair to say that it is a little excessive. The agency believes efforts to combine these accounts initial In 2018 – more mixed messaging will increase social media effects. SpaceFlight photographer welcomes the change in some viewers like John Kraus. Kraus described Consolidation as “long-term”. However, others claim that the closure of these accounts will be further limited to the public and attention of Trump’s investigation into America.

“In my opinion, the main power of social media allows individual voices and their questions to find individual audiences” Harvard University astronomer Jonathan McDowell tweeted Tuesday, June 10th. “To make a unit of a unit corporate account to replace an individual [NASA] Sounds are wrong. “

Agency saying The community cannot get social media updates on all affected SMD programs, but accounts will be archived or archived or archived

NASA X accounts (earlier Twitter), will be archived soon or serve as a critical distribution platforms for concrete research programs, space ships, rovers, satellites and other scientific initiatives. These are just some of the nixed ones:

• Tolerance Mars Rover: @nasapersever
• Curiosity Mars Rover: @MARSCUSIOTIONOSHY
• Voyager 1 and 2 Space Ship: @nasavoyager
• Trading Crew Program: @ Commercial_crew
• Exploration Places: @nasagroundsys
• International Space Station Study: @iss_reasch
• Space Start System (SLS): @nasa_sls
• Orion Space Ship: @nasa_orion
• Exoplanet Setting Satellite (Tess) Transfer (Tess): @nasa_tess
• GODDARD Space Research Institute: @nasagiss

Several of these accounts, for example, there is a viewer of the Rover X page of interest. “Don’t worry, my mission is not going anywhere,” Curiosity’s score provided fans on Monday, but not all of these programs will mean the same for all this programs.

Trump’s 2026 Financial Budget Request NASA offers to reduce financing about 25% in a year – the largest percentage offered in the history of the agency is one of the largest percentage reduced. This includes 47% of the agency’s science program, there is a “worthy” action to NASA Planet Society.

If approved by Congress would be budget kill At least 41 active and planned place mission. For example, Voyager’s financing will decrease by $ 7.8 million in 2026, then will fall to zero in 2029, Washington post declare. In the last few years, the mission of Mars, the mission of Mars, intending to return the surface of the red planet, which is greeted by NASA’s valued rover, is also in his native block. Financing cut As a result, the Orion Kapsulu and Space Launch System (SLS) Megarocket will also retire ARS TECHNICA.

The International Space Station (ISS) is already a sense of financing. The Center for Science in Space (CASIS) – Recently employs the ISS National Laboratory The upcoming space station research conference has been canceled Due to the “current regulation and budget environment.”

The proposal also contains a sweeper employees who will reduce the workforce of NASA. “This will represent the smallest NASA workforce before the mid-1960s, before the first American launches space,” Casey Dreier, the head of the Space policy recently in the planetary society tell Space.com. “It is a poverty level that we warn people,” Dreier said.

It is easy to see that NASA has been discarded in connection with the scientific future, why it is a nerve with some of the transportation of the broadcast, but it is not the only federal science agency that faces great changes to the online presence. Climent.govThe National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) website, the website for the climate program, most employees are expected to be closed on May 31, Guardian report. The affected staff said they believed they were aimed at the reconstruction of public climate data in the public.

Although there are different problems with NOAA and NASA, both institutions signaling a variable view for existing science, when we need the most needed.