Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
By Aditya Kalra and Arpan Chaturvedi
New Delhi (Reuters) -Samsung claims the import of India’s network gear, officially the same component has been aware of the same component in the same component in the same component, the same component has been aware of $ 520 million.
Samsung becomes a second large foreign company to protest the Indian tax demand in recent months.
Volkswagen sued the Prime Minister Narendra Modi government in court in court for a $ 1.4 billion demand for importing its components.
Samsung in Samsung in January, Samsung in the tax authorities, 520 million dollars to pay $ 520 million to $ 520 million, then billionaire Mukesh Ambani’s Telecom Nutani, since 2018 since 2021
In the 281-page problem in the appeal of the customs accessory and service tax in Mumbai, Samsung, “fully informed” to three years to three years, “long-term experience” was “long-term experience” for up to three years.
Samsung’s Indian section is notified in 2017, confidence in 2017, but the South Korean company did not report this to South Korean and Samsung’s tax authorities were never questioned.
“Appellant (Samsung), but also did not ask the same question … The branch was fully aware,” Samsung said, not in public, but noticeably.
Reliance Jio officials add to Samsung about the 2017 tax warning.
Samsung and India’s tax authority did not respond to Reuters requests.
Gelice’s more information from the tax authorities in 2017 is not open to the public and was not disclosed in the Samsung document. Reliance Reuters did not respond to inquiries.
In addition to $ 520 million, the Samsung faces, Indian government, received $ 601 million for $ 60 million, and up to $ 70 million. It is not clear if Samsung employees are not clear when they are separated from fines.
The tax request represents a significant part of the net profit of 955 million dollars in the 955-million net profit, consumer electronics and the largest players in the smartphone market in India.
In defending tariff declarations, Samsung claims that the tax authority passed “Hurry” in January and said “a fair opportunity” despite the “great share”.
