Scientists Are Sounding the Alarm Over Trump’s ‘Emergency’ Forest Logging Order

Aggressive efforts to trade the Trump administration to trade in the American deserate to trade in the trade entrusts, and everything from the eyebrows in serious concerns between scientists and the present and former federal land managers.

President signed two executive orders a month after Trump National Security Concerns Wood and Lumber Exports and Expansion American Timber productionThe Secretary of Agriculture squeezed Brooke Rollins.

Secretary published To create an “Emergency Definition” for 112,646,000 hectares of national forest (455,862 square kilometers). About 60% of the country’s national forest lands are about 60% of the country’s national forest lands, which are 154 national forest in the United States.

As a way of a crisis of the crisis of wildfires, “the protection of the environment” and “heavy federal policies” and “severe federal policies” and “Heavy Federal policies”, Los Padres was noted in the forest.

When contacting the comment, ForestWatch Executive Director Jeff Kuyler, according to the comments on the release, “This is a thin coated attempt to walk our national forests, budget cut and environmental rods.

The first 100 days of the second Trump administration, systematic suspension and work on the employees of the main federal science agencies that violate the ability to monitor and respond to the environment and public health crises.

Agencies such as NOAA in the department’s department Nasa It is mandatory make a frame and cancel Contracts and Research programs Despite the rule of evaluation, despite the critical roles in watching everything from hurricanes to the wild. There are many scientists and a civil servant pushed or redefined from National Park ServiceThe management is part of the country’s extensive effort to tear the number of employees who control the country’s wildlife.

As shown in the memory of the Secretary, the government would claim that there was an emergency medical determination protect Forests do not return protected status. But some experts do not agree.

“These orders are under the pretext of increasing the most understandable national security,” he said. “Diked and applied politics, weaken environmental protection to benefit from wealth corporations accelerated.”

It is impossible to say that Leslie and other environmentalists are against their control. Controller: The appointed fires and increte are regular devices in the forest management tool box, help to promote local environments to reduce and develop out of control and massive wildfire.

There are a large number of evidence that the treatment of special wood removal is reduced to the severity of wild fires, Mark Ashton, Yale University and the director of the university forests, an email in an email.

In addition, the country’s national forests are completely controlled by national parks. “The most part of their land base was managed for wood and entrance, so there is nothing new,” he said. “This is a question about how and where it is done.”

And have rub. Input and land management may seem very different under the Trump Office, which affects a huge cunning of giant national forests, which includes and approaching the approach, the latest executive power and secretariat.

“It is not delicate, generally not eliminated smaller [diameter at breast height] Trees, “Leslie said. Introduction is generally large, mature, often gathers a fairly large product of old growing trees. “In other words, the government’s executive rules seem to target a very different portion of the risks of the risks of the risks of woods.

“If you had a normal leader with a full professional workforce working for the forest service – this should not be a problem,” he said.

“The world has an experience inappropriate in the world or at least in the world,” he said. “It is concerned about seeing that most of these people are released and that this leadership will be observed to the numerous rules and rules that manage the land leadership.”

“As shown, many forest supervisors came out or retirees.” I hope the environment groups sue. “

This Biden management did not As far as he can He does not provide a lot of confidence in the management of our national forests, but to protect America’s forests, but not violated the attitude of the new leadership to scientific agencies and national parks.

“I think this is the long-term results of expanding actions,” Leslie said. “Threat of this type of entry in danger without comprehensive environmental analysis will be risky. These biodiversity will threaten water quality and intact.”

According to Los Padres Forest Clock, the most destructive fires will not be caught in the most destructive fires, on the contrary, these blazs are with extreme winds (as intensifies) Los Angeles’s destructive wildflies at the beginning of the year) and climatic conditions.

Using “emergency” declarations, fire protection puts special interests before the environment, including fake or firefighting, and the climate change puts more sensitive to local communities when the risk risk in the country is worse.

But it was led by His position has no secret Climate or. The most suitable situation between management and national forests may end in the courts, but Trump’s actions will prefer to move quickly or less than any other chaotic alternative. If you justify the old growth forest, it will take a long time to get it back.