Sin The game covers labor over botched welfare reforms

Sir Keir Starmer’s withdrawal from his welfare reforms on Tuesday evening was one of the greatest political sins in recent years.

In connection with some political decisions of the British Prime Minister and its closest allies, they caused doubts in Westminster.

Starmer himself called on his colleagues, who talked about the closet of the closet, “We will learn from our mistakes, but we will not burn each other.”

At the same time, “Sokehswitches” in Stils are asked for emergency questions – a working deputy was allowed to happen.

Sir Keir Starmer

Perhaps the starmer’s sin is surprising: Buck eventually stops with the Prime Minister itself.

The initial decision of the department of the Treasury and the Department of Jobs and Pensions was made with the blessing of the starmer’s benefits. One high treasure figure, 10, Starmer and consultants believed that the action is wrong, he said he had always had every opportunity to obstruct or change.

The Prime Minister was warned by his lashes months ago, the scale of the opposition in connection with his welfare reforms was dangerously monitored. Some of his sustainable street advisers felt that the deputies did not vote for the Prosperity bill.

Under, after 126, he fired as “noise” after 126 The rebels broke the ranks.

Only four days ago the starmer insisted that the benefits of the benefits were broken and corrected, “moral imperative.”

Starmer faced questions about the degree of international journey, who visited 26 years. In the past, the NATO summit in the G7 session in the Hague and Canada in the past.

He admitted that he did not pay attention to the progress of welfare reforms. “I payed a lot of attention to what happened to the Middle East with NATO all weekend.

Rachel Reeves

Chancellor was one of the most intended supporters of the prosperous bill, in the original form of the original form of £ 4.8 billion for infectious.

Reeves, in one-on-one conversations last week in one-on-one conversations, was uncompromising in determination to push the account.

Some said that the voting will be a facto confidence vote for the government on Tuesday – a warning that further increases its political shares.

Some labor lawmakers will now stay in the treasury soon, while others, while others have been operating more than society – will not solve their political problems.

Starmer said that the reives would stay in the Chancellor until the end of the parliament. However, during the Prime Minister’s questions on Wednesday, Tory Leader Kemi Badenoch swept his question when asked. Only his spokesman said that Chancellor did not go anywhere.

Liz Kendall

The secretary of work and pensions insulting is not a stranger to acquire 4.5 percent of the votes in the 2015 Labor Management. But Kendall struggled to hide their frustration as a Saturday night brief to cut into ribbons months after heavy work.

Kendall was one of the most Bdanitarian figures in the Starmer’s office and effectively believed in the potential to promote more disabled people to work again. However, the volume and scale of cutting by the street and the treasury were applied.

Usually efferves commons performers are described as a “tortured” figure in the front bench during the second reading of the bill and is not there to return it.

Morgan McSweeney

FT was Starmer’s Chief of Staff last Wednesday “lightning bar“The anger of entertaining MPs does not want to vote for a bill that will receive a few amounts of money from England’s most unfavorable people.

The longest period has been the most reliable assistant, immigration, economics, defense and well-being, economics, defense and well-being immigration, protection and welfare to neutralize the rise of the British Party.

On Tuesday, the Cabinet and Starmer called on McSweeney to not give a brief information. “We will not open our employees, including our employees, but no one of us would sit around this cabinet table.”

A Downing Street Fighter, McSweenEey’s primarily said that the prosperous bill causes reservations.

“Anyone who has any understanding of the well-being or PLP has argued against it,” he said. “Morgan saw that he could be painted as balancing the books behind the poor.”

Assumptions continue that McSweeney may decide to return to HQ before the next general election to pay attention to the election strategy, rather than helping the government.

Liz Lloyd

Lloyd, the director of policy transportation in Downing Street, remained large amounts to strengthen the operation earlier this year.

Lloyd has worked as a fixer to Tony Blair 10 by 2007 and later worked in banking. Some labor for the debacili this week is already blamed by the left wings of the week.

“Liz Lloyd cooked on the flight,” he said, one person involved in the negotiations. “He headed the policy process until the summer statement. Last week, until Thursday, when Keir changes his tone of agreement, he was against concessions.”

Claire Reynolds

Former Assistant Reynolds for Tony Blair and Gordon Brown are responsible for Liaing, 403 MPs. The original welfare reform was not convinced enough to go with the package, and therefore receives the share of sin for the government’s embarrassing.

Reynolds, Jonathan Reynolds, Secretary of Jonathan Reynolds, a month ago presentations a month ago to convince the reforms. “He made him best, but he fell into a stonystage,” he said.

Angela Rayner

The Deputy Prime Minister is one of several politically politically strengthened politics after the chaos this week.

Rayer was placed to try to bring the rebels to the line, despite the direct responsibility for the policy of welfare. Although the efforts failed, MPs used more charm from strong goal tactics.

There was also Totem for colleagues who want to increase taxes instead of performing the benefits. Earlier this year, Rayer was established by Rayer to establish various proposals for taxes that could lift a special commemorative and labor.

On Wednesday, Rayoner insisted that he was not interested in succeeding as the Prime Minister, adding that he was “a very difficult job” and already made changes and changes to employment rights.

Labor government reflection First year in government He said, “There are many things we do, there are many things that we are true and we should think.”