Some countries do not retaliate against Trump tariffs. Canada ‘to turn the other cheek’?

Some countries encountered by the US President Donald Trump, converted their duties by turning their duties by turning their other chips.

Canada, but continues to hit the south in the trade war with its neighbor. However, this can be given general economic damage from the Strikes of Canada, painful, full-scale trade conflict.

It is perhaps surprising that there are different scenes of economists. Some will not have a choice but to retaliate from Canada, but even if the US goods apply. Others offer these actions to have little impact on the United States

Werner Antweiler, Associate Professor in International Trade Policy at the University of British Columbia, Associate Professor and the department said that Ottawa was the right to return to the fire.

“Although the legislature is harmful to our economy, it is harmful to our economy, the prices are higher than the price.”

However, the associate professor or economy at McMaster University says Pujolas Pujolas did not need time to spend time with the Tariff Fighting Tariff Tariff.

Instead, I hope the economy will be better help with the opening of a red ribbon that can overcome obstacles and other countries with other countries

“I would obviously say that Americans stood up and destroy their companies … let them trust in Canadian products, they will destroy them.”

‘Have to take revenge’

Like any tariff, Canada’s revenge against the United States is almost completely affiliated with Canadian consumers, where the economy will harm the economy, where Trevor Tombe, the economy of Calgary.

“It should not be not and not to say that we do not have to do not have to retaliate, as in the political arena, to revenge to achieve non-economic goals.

In this case, against the Trump Office, he sees “more political activities to form a conversation, narrative and public relations campaigns.”

The US economy is limited to truly influence, he said in an email to CBC news.

Again, Canada on Wednesday, after the application of all imported steel and aluminum tariffs, $ 29.8 billion worth of American goods will be revenated by the tariffs of American goods. This is in addition to the tariffs of American goods worth $ 30 billion worth $ 30 billion, after the initial tariffs of Trump last week.

Meanwhile, Ottawa threatened $ 100 billion worth of tariffs if the Trump was pushed with mutual tariffs on April 2.

“I think Canada is forced to take revenge,” Because because the US market relys on the target of Toronto, Peter tomorrow, Economy in the University of the School of School of Jobs and Social Policy.

“About 90 percent of Canadian steel or aluminum exports go to the United States, so Canada can actually sit around. Canada must develop a sort of deal.”

However, some countries that are afraid of retaliation from the United Kingdom, Australia, Australia and Mexico, there are still reasons to draw tariff triggers, Antweiler says.

The UK, for example, looking for new post-brexit trading arrangements and most importantly, looking for a free trade agreement with the United States. The Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s government is looking for a kind of agreement with Ukraine, so he does not want to remember Trump.

Starmer, saying that all the options are on the table, will receive a “pragmatic answer” and retreated after the US steel and aluminum tariffs brought from any country.

In the first period of the Trump, Australia was able to refuse freedom from the tariffs imposed in 2018, and this could hope to take to another for another round for the last period.

The head of the General Vice President and head of the capital markets for Scotiabank and the head of the capital and the head, which are not in the same position in Canada, such as Great Britain and Australia.

“Australia and England are easier to turn the other cheek because this is less than less than the United States, less than they are less exposed to trade,” he said.

One fifth of exports in the UK says that a good part of this is the financial services. Australia’s export to the United States is only four percent of total exports.

Diplomatic entry

The targets of the preliminary tariffs launched in Trump, Canada and Mexico, while Mexican President Claudia Sheenbaum remained frosty between Canada and the United States

Ottawa has a free trade agreement with Washington and remained in the talks – a diplomatic solution – when the crisis develops, Sylvanus Afsorgbor, Food, Agriculture and Resource Economics says the Associate Professor of the University of Guel.

Therefore, Afesorgbor considers revenge “very right.”

“There’s nothing we can do now,” he said. “We’ve run out of every spoken environment. So we press the wall.”

However, he should pay attention to the fact that officials are careful not to blankets all US goods.

“You must be very elective,” Afesorgbor said he believed that federal officials had experience in tariff imports that can be replaced by Canadian manufacturers.

For example, the import of Canada really trusted, which would be a really bad idea to punch the tariffs that tomorrow as Morguational. However, something like the US beverage actually makes sense.

“Canadians will not be so bad. They can still have many options. But US producers have now lost sales,” he said.

“Sometimes super open. But it’s very difficult to say other times,” OK, what are the goods that have other options? What are the goods trusted us for the US market? ‘”

So far, Canada does this correctly, does not apply tariffs for blankets, dollars for dollars, but in areas that can minimize damage to Canadian consumers.

“We look at the sectors with easy local substitutes or the substitutes of the third country,” he said. “All really focused on reducing damage.”