Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
He is our time innovative. “Fashuse” can be its middle name. Technology, it seems, in its DNA. Again, Elon Musk is probably a luddit strip of allegedly – does not use the computer.
Revelation did not come from a biography or the whole interview. It came in the high stakes, Musk and Openai, who was tried in a northern California courtroom, came in the high stakes. The corporate betrayal and a billion dollar secretly stole this strange detail show among Thorny questions.
Yes, you heard that right. It’s not a joke from the late late show. This is not this. The musk is coming from its lawyers.
In the legal letter whole On June 22, the legal group of the musk was withdrawn from Openai against the accusations they could not hand over the relevant documents. When Openai Aklai refuses to collect certain materials, his lawyers called the accusation “wrong” and threw the bomb crime in this process.
Mr. Musk does not use the computer, “At Toberoff and Associates, they wrote on the first page of the lawyers at the first page of lawyers.
There is only one problem with this claim: public evidence, including the polytheism itself, is also another. X employees The string explained Musk works primarily from its phone but also notes that a laptop uses a laptop.
More carefully, the musk referred to the computer in its social media posts. In December 2024, the ministry shared a picture with the text, saying, “It is a picture of this laptop,” Starlink used to test the flight capabilities. Recently, in May 2025, when playing the game, musk responsible In the X, he is still using an @doge label made by a fan from an ancient PC laptop. “
This is a picture of my laptop. It’s about 3 years old. A guy in Germany gave me this cool label so I don’t want to upgrade it and lose the label. pic.twitter.com/wjzbhpkus8
– Elon Musk (@elonmusk) 31 December 2024
This contradiction arises from the “Discover” stage of the claim that SAM SAM Altman accused of betraying the founding mission. As the two sides struggle with internal documents, the battle intensified. In this context, more and more visible documents such as personal Quirts are similar to the potential legal tactics to restrict the volume of documents that can be found. After all, if there is no computer, there are no computer documents to hand.
Musk v. Altman’s case is an AI management and property war. Musk, anoint Openai co-founder, now describes himself as the most prominent critic, argues the company’s spirit by selling the company to Microsoft. Openai, in turn, described the musk as a bitter partner, chose to leave.
However, this legitimate drama shadows a strange claim in a strange claim that seems conflicting in the contradictory claim in the contradictory lawsuit of its public disclosures.
