The Australian woman begins with a deadly mushroom cooking in cooking

An Australian woman accused of cooking a fatal fungal dish, to assume wild funghi, to assume wild fungus, to lie to the police, but the “tragedy” is a “terrible accident”.

Erin Patterson’s Court of Yargıtay is expected to start in the small Victoria district, 50, Wednesday.

He is accused of killing three people and killed in three cases of a man in a business in Wellington lunch in July 2023 and a person who attracted global attention.

Three people in the days of the meal, including the former laws of Ms. Patterson, Don Patterson, 70 and Gail Patterson, 70, Gailin Sister Heather Wilkinson, 66.

Ms. Patterson admitted that he was not guilty, and the defense group says “Tell” after serving their family members to their family.

A lunch guest survived – Local Pastor Ian Wilkinson – Treatment in the hospital in weeks.

Beef Wellington, cotton potatoes and green bean lunches have mushrooms, and the diseases of the guests heard the court, not in the dispute.

“The main thing is whether he caused him to kill or not very serious injury,” said the judge Christopher Beale said.

On Wednesday, the prosecutor nanetten Rogers SC said that this case was opened in court, “first was the event of a mass food poisoning.”

But the prosecutors said Ms. Patterson’s bidders “deliberately poisoned”, “cancer was diagnosed” after inviting dinner.

Dr. Rogers, jury, MS Pattero, MS Porto, the mushrooms of the mushroom, said he traveled to Leongatha’s house close to the house.

In the days after lunch, he took a number of steps to “hide” his work.

They say that in court, he lied about the source of the leading fungi – said that they came from Asian grocery in Melbourne and never to eat the wild. And a food prepares toxic dish so she traveled to a local dump to throw dehydrated prosecutors.

“You can be interested, ‘What is the motive?'” Doctor Rogers Jury, “You can still be interested in the end of this court.”

The prosecutor’s office will not be offered a concrete motif, explained.

“You don’t have to be happy with what the motive is or even one.”

The jury expect what to hear, he said: Mr. Wilkinson said: Mr. Wilkinson, Ms. Patterson’s house Simon Patterson, lunch guests and police officers investigated.

However, the defense reminded that the jury did not hear any real evidence and said that they still did not hear anything.

Products Colin Mandy, the prosecutor’s office, as a “sinner”, as a “sinner”, should think about how someone can react to the jury.

“Can people think good or well thought or look bad?”

“Defense work is so sick because these four people serve them, because he panicked. Three people died.”

According to him, Mrs. Patterson did not serve to deliberately non-poisoned food guests.

“He could not hurt anyone that day … a tragedy, a tragedy, was a terrible accident.”