Physical Address

304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

The British Supreme Court shall make a key decision on the concept of “women” under the existing equality law


London – The Supreme Court of England has managed to identify a woman of the law of a British equality as a biological woman. Justice Patrick Hodge said that five judges in court decided unanimously, that the equality belongs to the “woman ‘and’ sex ‘and biological sex and biological sex.”

Judgment about interpretation 2010 A transgender man with a certificate that knows them as a woman should not be considered a woman for equality purposes by law. However, the court added that this “gender re-appointment is protected from discrimination”, “Transs,” protection. “

The court stems from the 2018 law, which has been 50% of the Scottish parliament, which is 50% of the Scottish parliament on the board of the Scottish Public Institutions. The concept of women in this law included transgender women.

The Women’s Rights Group for the Women’s Rights Group (FWS) claimed to challenge this law by claiming that the woman’s re-appointment beyond parliament. However, Scottish officials then left the new leadership, saying that the woman’s definition includes a gender recognition document. Fws tried to overcome it successfully.

UK-Supreme Court-Gender.jpg

Susan Smith (L) and Marion Calder, “For Women, Scotland, speaking to the media outside the UK Supreme Court in London on April 16, 2025.

And kitwood / getty


The judge made by the Best British Court is coming between the efforts of the Trump management Bar Transgender people From serving US military and To participate in a female sportand forbidden Gender-approved care for minors – many facing legal problems in US courts.

FWS said the result may be the results of Scottish and elders for single-sex facilities such as sex-based rights and toilets, hospital wards and prisons.

“It means that the concept of sexual intercourse is that 50% of people with 50% of people and certificates of folk boards are still able to meet the goals for women’s representative office,” said Group’s director Trina Budge said.

The call was rejected by a court in 2022, but this group was allowed last year to take to the Supreme Court.

A lawyer for Fws Aidan O’Neill, the judges of the Supreme Court – three men and two women – in the act of equality “sex” should be understood in Biological Sex and “Ordinary, daily language”.

“Our position is your gender, a man or a girl or a boy or a boy, even by a man’s body, even in Utero,” he said. “This is an expression of body reality. It is an unchanging biological situation.”

The right group of women, the author, which is considered among the supporters, was reported to tens of thousands of pounds of tens of thousands of pounds. Harry Potter was a vocal regarding the lack of a biologically born of the rights of Trans Women’s Rights.

Opposition groups, including Amnesty International, said the transgender people were conflicted by human rights laws from sex.

Amnesty said a brief statement in the court, who said he was worried about violating the rights of the rights in England and abroad.

“Blanket policy forbidden to women from single-sex services is not a tool proportional to achieve a legal goal.”



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *