The Court of Appeals will temporarily keep the National Protector in the Trump-A LA


The Court of Appeal, California, has temporarily blocked the command of the Federal judge managing the Trump management to return to the National Security Troops.

The decision of the Court of Appeal, Trump’s placement of Trump in Los Angeles in Los Angeles in a few hours later, said immigration raids are illegal.

Trump said he took the name of the troops – usually in the authority of the governor – to stop the “burning” of the LA in protests against the immigration shot.

California Governor Gavin Newsom and other local authorities, rejected this action and said it was an unnecessary provocation. The Court of Appeal said he would hold a hearing on Tuesday.

Earlier, the question presented in the Federal Court, Judge Charles Breyer, California’s demand, Trump followed the law on the placement of the National Workers of the State.

“No,” the judge wrote in his decision. “His actions were illegal … Therefore, the governor of the California National Guard must refund control to the California National Guorerator.”

However, the judge ordered the TRUP management time to apply for the time of the Trump Friday afternoon. Management did it immediately after the order was issued.

Watch: Trains for crowd control as the protests continue in Los Angeles in the National Guard

News, on Thursday, “Only our servicemen confirmed that our servicemen belonged to the battlefield, not in our streets.”

Trump management said the California National Guard was necessary for their purchase and sale of people in Los Angeles in Los Angeles, who was illegally in Los Angeles, who had been illegally.

Despite the newsmown protests, Trump has ordered a total of 4,000 national security officers and 700 marine pedestrians to cancel the riots. Some of the guard troops are now allowed to keep people until the police are arrested.

The President placed the national security guard 50 years ago, 50 years ago without the consent of the last governor. It is more to activate troops to combat a governor’s natural disasters and other emergencies and then ask federal assistance.

On Thursday, the lawyer of the Justice department told Judge Breyer that the Trump said that the newsom did not need to consult.

“The Governor Newsom was fully aware of this order … he protested,” he said. “There is a commander-in-command of the US Armed Forces.”

“No,” Judge Breier, the younger brother of the former Supreme Court Stephen Brayer, responded.

“The President, the head of the National Guard – is not the head of the National Guard,” he said, but there were times and situations that the president could be turned into the heads.

Boytie forgiving a light blue, Breyer called the Constitution many times in the court session and took a copy of a booklet at a time.

“We are talking about the president who exercises his powers. The president, of course, is limited in its powers,” he said. “This is the difference between the Constitutional Government and the King George.”

In the face of the judge’s sentence, the Secretary of Defense Hegseth, repeatedly refused to say if the judge will follow the order of the judge.

“We should not determine the country’s foreign policy or national security policy,” said Hegseth, we should not determine the National Security Policy for a house speaking at the meeting of the Armed Service Committee on Thursday.

Hegseth said he would decide the Supreme Court.

The Court of Appeals allows the decision to remain on Thursday, national security troops remain in Los Angeles, because the work passes through the courts.

Trump management used a law that allows the President’s National Guard to the National Guard to the Federal Service when the President’s “rebellion”.

However, the California court says that the protests stretching up to about a week and the closure of more than 300 imprisonment and the main highway – did not rise to this level.

“There have been a rebellion or rebellion at any point in the last three days. These objections or other large cities rise to the level of protest or riots in recent years, including in recent years.” The court readings.

Additional Report by Home Faguy in Washington, DC



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *