The dispute to the US bombing is recalls the punishment of the Iraq war

In 2016, Donald Trump called Iraq’s occupation “a great oil error”, as a result of a deliberate act of deliberately by US intelligence.

“They lied!” In February, in February, he said during the preliminary dispute. “They said that the mass destruction was weapons of mass destruction. None were. They knew that no one was.”

Now Trump weighs a military intervention in the White House war It has parallels with Iraq’s release of exhaust of Eerie – he said that it was a $ 2-dollar waste.

As now, the justification for war is to get a country Nuclear weapons And thus, take the existential threat to one of America’s closest allies – Israel.

Then, as now, some port doubts that the threat of WMD is real.

“Although intelligence is Iran’s nuclear program, although the weapon repentance, the director of the Middle East Program in defense priorities Rosemary Kelanic, a center of thinking.

Some went on. A “lying” a “lying” a “false” “lie” a “false lie” a “false” a “false” “a” false “” lying “a” lying “a” false “” a “lying” in the regime in the regime in Tehran regime in Tehran.

“In fact, Iran has near the bomb setting or plans. None,” No, wrote in X. ”

Criticism of the latest annual US intelligence threat presented by National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard in March in March.

While the Iranian enriched Uranium congregation is the highest level, he insisted that he did not build an atomic bomb from Tehran.

But Trump rejected this assessment. “I do not care about what he say,” he said on Tuesday’s opinion of Gabbar. Iran was “very close” to be one of the people nuclear weapon.

Trump 2025 is not the only skeptics of threatening assessment. “It’s pretty stupid,” he said. “No country has not enriched 60 percent of cleanliness (Iranian) without continuing nuclear weapons.”

He recently called the International Atomic Energy Agency, the UN nuclear guard, the Iranian nuclear guard, inability to cooperate with Iranian inspectors. Recently, IAEA announced the Islamic Republic in violation of their liabilities for the first time in about 20 years.

Retired General and former CIA Director David Petraeus, who once headed the central command of the United States, said he was “concerned about anxiety” to build a nuclear bomb. “It’s closer than the beginning,” he said, the leadership of the country will not be able to decide to do one.

“We always said that we would not allow nuclear weapons and think that we would know whether the weapon is rich.” “But this is not something you want to relax in the best job assumptions. This should be in the worst situation.”

Others also have similar landscapes.

Former advantage of the Iranian State Department Suzanne Maloney, “This crisis has all the signs of this crisis from 2002, all the signs of this crisis, a program designed for construction, civil infrastructure and energy production.”

However, it surprised that Trump was not only after Tehran’s acquisition of nuclear weapons alone.

Maloney said: “What I worried … This has jumped a few steps since we will be true and do not mind, but are not supported by intelligence.”

This impression was united with an informal road policy in Trump’s White House. “The president is making informed decisions based on information, not the best advice of informative consultants,” he said.

Some analysts are very sensitive to the influence of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who insists on Iran’s uranium in Iran.

The skeptics were surprised that the president’s promise to end the promise of America will end the promise of “Eternal Wars” and not to judge the mood accurately.

“Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are certainly restrained tales,” Petraeus said.

The dispute between Iraq’s probable WMD program, the Americans came back to the country’s 9/11 attacks after the need to retreat against the country’s enemies. The feedback on the wisdom of foreign military signs is now divided.

In defense priorities, Kelanic, then he went to Congress for 18 months to work for the Wight War and also to get permission.

Damage to the military action also announced the tension stretching between Trump and more isolated watchers in the Maga camp, and carlson between them.

Somewhat Erstwile fans The President treased that he betrayed the “first” principles of “America’s first” principles, “neoconservative support, unilateral operation in hostile countries, to defend regime change in enemy countries, and act unilaterally in the world.

This week, in Carlson’s viral interview, Ted Cruz said that the Republican Senator and Trump supporters should support Israel in the war with Iran.

“I want to stop a lunatic wanting to kill us from getting a nuclear weapon that can kill me millions of Americans,” said Cruz Carlson. “You say, I can’t see how America will benefit anyway. This is strange … insulating.”

Carlson mocked the credentials of Mocking Cruz’s foreign policy, and “nothing knows about the country you want to overthrow the government,” he said.

In the Trump Pro-Trump coalition, some of them are careful in the president Slipping in IranOthers, suddenly said it was wrong to offer neoconservative.

“Almost exactly 10 years, on June 6, 2015, when the escalator descended and his candidacy … Iran cannot be nuclear weapons,” he said. “He was completely consistent.”