Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
The European Commission was wrong to refuse to release text messages sent to the President of Pfizer during the talks to ensure the Covid-19 vaccine of Ursula Von Der Leyen.
The General Court said The commission, president and Pfizer did not give an acceptable explanation because the exchange of the exchange between Albert Bourla and the investigation could not be announced in 2021.
That year, Pfizer signed a billions of euros in vaccine contracts, including a contract in addition to 1.8 billion.
The content of the messages between Von Der Leyen and Mr. Bourla remains a rule known as PFizergate in Brussels.
Corruption group transparency welcomed the decision of the International European Court A “remarkable victory for transparency in the EU”Added “Relationship to Freedom of Data” to put an end to a catalyst to put an end.
Von Der Leyen became the President of the Commission in 2019 and faced the position of leading the EU’s reaction to the Covid Pandemic in a year.
Earned the second five-year term at the end of last year. On Wednesday, the referee, due to the lack of transparency due to the lack of transparency, the lack of a pfizer vaccination deal played a significant role.
The commission said that it would be closely learned and considered the next steps, but insisted that Transparency “was always important“.
New York Times Journalist Matina Stevis, the dispute started on April 2021, after gaining regulation approval of Ursula Von Der Leien, the German partner was discussed with the Pfizer Boss.
The article said that an investigation, Alexander Fanta, who served as a request for freedom of information to see the exchange of messages between January 2021, 2021, and the European Commission turned it.
Under the transparency rules of the commission, all employees, including the President, must archive their documents.
However, mobile text messages are a gray region and the work has a large size of hinges in connection with the lack of consideration of important notes.
An EU official has not been “systematically public documents” of SMS messages this week and that it was not noted.
Fanta, in 2021 he received a lawsuit in the European Ombudsman Found that the commission could not look for text messages It corresponds to maladministration outside of the regular record.
Stevis and the New York Times followed the European Commission when the messages were not yet released.
The decision on the problem of Stevis, the court managed to re-establish the claims of the EU Executive Director, or for assumptions or uncertainty. “
The court said that a presumption was denied or did not have the documents or to prove that they do not have the absence or possess.
The commission did not deleted text messages, whether it has changed the trial and has been deleted, if it has changed it or mobile phone.
