The Oversight Board will weigh in on Meta’s new hate speech policies

Two weeks ago, Meta was announced two weeks before Donald Trump’s inauguration Mark Zuckerberg and a small group consultant group to moderation procedures at the highest level. Among the detainees were the company’s own control of the company, which was created by meta to form the most sensitive policy decisions by Meta. The group will now seek to explore these changes and test the application of its powers to do it.

The changes have sharply regulated the content of how meta, the company’s content within Facebook, Instagram and themes. This has completed the verification program in the United States, and the hate speech, which protects immigrants and LGBTQ users, turned back the rules of speech. Unlike previously activated approach, it also changed its content moderation procedures for many types of posts that violate many rules if other users give them.

The changes raised the questions about the role of the Control Council, because Zukderberg said once, Facebook should not make such important decisions about our free expression and security. ” What is now, what is this, what is the point of any independent control board of critics?

However, the lationer board is already trying to resolve the “Hate Behavioral” policies of the meter, a member of the Board of Engadget, who speaks Engadget. Zuckerberg, when he announces changes in early January, the Board had four open cases related to metal hate speech rules. Now the Board plans to use these cases to explore new policies Describe immigrants and use the language of dehydration to blame LGBTQ people to be mentally ill.

“After January 7, we can clearly postponed the decision, and if we could return to Meta and ask a new few questions,” said Carozza, a legal professor on Notse Dame, told Engadget in 2022. “Find more information, find more information, try as much as possible to use the means we have to bring more transparency.”

According to the plaque, Carozza, the new hatred was briefed with meta as he receives more information about the policies of speech. However, it may still be a while before the findings clearly exercise. Open cases are in several aspects of metage hate speech rules, including , , and .

Along with the questions around each case, Carozza said that the board has also struggled with the prioritization of business decisions, taking into account the updated importance of key policies. “There are competitive concerns about more thoughtful and intentional facility and effective,” he said.

However, the Board may hope that the meter will provide more transparency on decision-making, which is unknown how much the board will effect. According to its rules, Meta is required to comply with the decisions of the group around only individual articles. The Board’s policy recommendations are not compulsory and meta a in carrying out their suggestions.

It is not clear how much the exchange of betting is the conclusion of the metage, the closure of facts and the moderation of the active content. “We were a general inspection program, but our usual circumstances make this problem a little difficult to obtain this problem, because this is not within the appeal process,” said Carozza. The Board notes, as a policy of the surrounding rules can write a recommendation opinion and meta’s The rules of celebrities. However, the Board of Directors only authorizes this kind of mandatory recommendations in the request of the meter.

Happens in one Control Board: It can act independently, but the meta endors how much can affect. “The standard of the standard for the management staff and the success of the Standard, 100%,” Carozza says: “Carozza says that accountability and control are a part of a compound sticky puzzle.

Again, the group’s lack of consultation with such large policy actions, asked some concerned questions for the plaque. Dozens of civil society teams have been signed recently He called on board members to resign. In Zuckerberg, members of some congress members, when Meta refuses to follow its principles, he said, “toothless” board “toothless”.

Carozzo confesses the restrictions on the control board, but the billions of people are finally compared to the board in metha’s apps. “Everybody else would resign the MASSE … The only people to lose are the end users of the methane, especially in sensitive positions [and] Communities in the world. “