The Royal Donald’s Court

Unlock Watch Bulletin Free from White House

Trump’s second term Washington, your guide for what tools for business and world

Writer, IWM is a ft contributor editor for liberal strategies, Sofia and co-work in Vienna, Sofia and colleague

It’s an old quarrel: is the power to be violated or the fear of losing? Whatever the right answer, it is clear that something remarkable in the United States today.

In the last two weeks, the media was filled with the stories of President Donald Trump’s personal enrichment. According to the report, Trump family and their business partners gathered $ 320 million in a new cryptist, broker estate deals worth $ 320 million and applauded a luxury jet offer to the US government.

Forbes estimated that Trump’s net worth reached $ 1.2 billion between the 2024 and 2025 March.

This unusual situation raises three main questions. First, why does Trump even claim to follow the ordinary presidential script to build a beautiful wall between the public office and private business? Second, why did the people move in the growing wealth and interest of the Trump family? Third, how long can the tolerance last?

The President’s son Donald Trump JR responded straight to the first question. Speaking at a business forum in Qatar, the Trump family said the game is the game that plays “Whatever happens to you.” There is a point.

Anti-corruption in the past is almost impossible to believe that everyone who opposes anti-corruption anti-corruption is not doing so to be rich. The main difference here is between those who do not hide conflicts of interest and cover them. Hunter Bideni’s epics are a reminder that the attempts to illuminate the work deals of a president can be further angry than themselves.

Trump also benefited from the size of its earnings. A hundred layers or higher money from annual incomes for ordinary citizens is almost incomprehensible. The people do not think billions, so Trump’s deals are more or less meaningless.

The second question is why the people are unemployed? – especially painful for many. “The general public has never taken care of this,” Kenneth Starr did not pay attention to Paul Rosenzweig, who was a consultant in the investigation of President Bill Clinton or “He did not pay attention to the public.” According to him, anti-corruption anti-corruption anger “Always an elite imagination was a fiend.”

More than that. Historically, the subjects of the monarchs in many countries were transparent to the royal corruption; The lavish lifestyle of Royals is constantly on the public screen.

In the 19th century, conventional wisdom was a form of a strong government for the fact that people understood him. Today, democracy is considered in the same way. When people stop the meaning of corruption, when people stop the meaning of democracy – people arise when they do not know who decisions are. “Who really decides?” It is a question separate from modern democracy. Are leaders following the will of voters or donors? The rulers are selected or anonymous face bureaucrats.

Easy to place your hopes in a charismatic person than the comprehensive institutional machine of modern democracy in the comprehensive institutional machine. The growing complaint of personalized power is the direct result of how people do not understand how democracy works.

“Who decides?” Trump’s White House is a question you don’t have to worry. Strange and eventually enrichment of his family, he lost part of his fear. Trump, all American presidents may be one of the most stained, but it is the most transparent.

There is a discreet charm of stepped modes – the charm of work as a family job. As Trump realizes, personal power weakens and uses it, is threatened if he is deprived of irrigation, not corruption.

His control is hell for conspiracy theorists, because everything is on the surface. The current wave of anti-liberalism is rebelled against double standards. In a community-controlled society, it is the only one who is a sarcastic safe. In the idealized version, modern democracy promises a political leader to treat their children as others. But for those who vote for new potential, this is a “big lie”.

As for the answer to the third question – how long the people’s tolerance for Trump’s “beautiful” deal can last – it remains. But one thing is clear: If many of our citizens return against this office, the war is likely to be “hypocrisy”.