The UK laws say “Social media age is not in line with age” says summer riots

British laws, which limited the criminal cases, stressed how many the riots of the government, “Signal Ages in Social Media Ages, in Britain, the riots in Britain.

Faring riot, fuel from the right, A young man affected by several cities and cities in a teenager, Britain’s Southport killed three daughters in the Taylor Swift-themed dance class in England on July 29. A few hours after stabbing, the attacker claims that an undocumented Muslim immigrant is spreading to the Internet rapidly.

In a report that looks at the riots, a parliamentary staff, after the attack, created a vacuum in which the lack of information from the authorities “The incorrect information could grow.” The report accused the laws of decades and decades and decades aimed at preventing the bias of the jury that suspended the improvement of the wrong claims.

Over time, the suspect has announced that it has reached millions of fraudulent claims.

The House Affairs Committee, who brought together the political spectrum, police officers, government officials and emergency workers reported four-month hearing.

Axel Rudakubana, Sentenced to life in prison For the attack, he was born and raised by the Christian family from Rwanda in England. Later found that one judge was not a single argument that one was managed by one single Political or religious ideologybut excited violence.

Karen Bradley, the conservative party, leading the House Affairs Committee, “bad faith actors” used the attack. However, it added that the lack of accurate information allows you to spread.

“Without the failure to disclose the information to the community,” false claims filled the gap and flourished online, removing the confidence in the police and government agencies. “

The report of the committee, two fake claims expressing two fake claims, about two hours after the attack, claimed that the suspect was “Muslim immigrant”. Took over 3.8 million views.

The second sent to the second, the suspect called “Mi6 Watch List” called a shelter seeker called “Al-al-Sigati”, he said. The writing received about 27 million meetings in the X for a day. The Merseyside police did not explain that the local force investigating the attack was the wrong one on the day of July 30.

After hours, the first riot appeared in Southport. The disorder continued in many cities and cities and targeted many protest mosques and hotels asylum seekers. Two buildings were fired while people were inside. During the imperfes, more than 300 police officers were injured and the reaction was about 28 million pounds or $ 36 million in the reaction, about $ 36 million.

He added that the Merseyside police said they were legally blocked by the identity of the suspect in a very difficult situation and confirmed that the prosecutors were not a Muslim.

“It is impossible to determine whether or not whether the disorder has been published or not,” he said.

However, after stabbing, the lack of information was not “wrong information will be wrong, public confidence” and the law “does not correspond to social media age.”

In Britain, a law prohibits the name of the suspects under the age of 18 if a law is not excluded. Mr Rudakuba was 17 years old during the attack. Another law designed to protect the right to the exhibition court prohibits the publication of information that can affect the jury. This rule, a part of the 1981 contempt of the court is removed after the accused was found guilty or innocent.

Serena Kennedy, Merseyside’s Chief Constable, On the evening of July 29, the attacker was born in Wales, but the wrong information was already spread.

Ms. Kennedy said that Mr. Rudakubmanan has not been a Muslim and plan to prepare an announcement two days later to clarify that his parents were not Christians. After warning the Crown Prosecutor’s Office, the body, which brought a criminal charges in the UK, said the information should not be announced.

“This case, why we can release the information, to make sure that we are affected by the criminal justice,” Ms. Kennedy’s “said that we will be considered in terms of social media.

In the statement, although the Crown Prosecutor’s Office said, “Different opinion” about the religion of Mr Rudakuba’s religion, the jury said.

The statement added: “We support the proposals for legal reform when we are more clear and simpler to the law of contemporary law, especially if public safety or national security.”

The British and Wales Bank reviews the contemptibility of the Court’s discrimination since the Southport attack.