The US Supreme Court blocks the use of foreign enemies of the Trump Administration | Donald Trump News

The Supreme Court of the United States has filed an emergency application from a group of migrants in Texas, the use of the 18th century is banned to save the law of war.

The decision on Friday (PDF) In 1798, undocumented immigrants are another blow to the President Donald Trump, who wants to use rapidly non-deputies.

Only two conservative justice disputes: Clarence Thomas and Samuel alito.

Although the Supreme Court has not yet been managed in connection with the use of Trump’s act of foreign enemies, there is a “Injnetic Relief” on “Injnetic Relief”, which resulted in law for centuries.

“For a long time,” no man “,” No man, “be heard from the opportunity, for a while,” the majority of the trial wrote in his power.

A confirmed previous review Migrants in the United States has the necessary process – In other words, the judicial system has the right to listen to fair listening – before their deportation.

Two names from Venezuela, which are determined only with the initials, were brought in Friday. They are carried out in a control center in North Texas.

Trump management blamed themAnd others from Venezuela, become a member of the Tren de Aragua bunch. Later, “Occupation” and Link Train De Aragua’s connection to the United States, the Venezuelan government, the Venezuelan government, recently announced intelligence memo.

This controversed Trump leadership, only in the history of US and only in the war periods of alien enemies used before three times before.

However, the use of Trump’s illegal use of the law of foreign enemies, a legal return, a legal return, a legal decline, a legal decline, a legal decline.

More than one judge forbidden The use of the law for accelerated removal. However, a judge in Pennsylvania, Trump administration proposed notice to place the law and a notification of the deportation. Offered 21 days.

On Friday, the Supreme Court, Trump did not lose due to whether the law should be used. Instead, his decision – a total of 24 pages, on the contrary, the question of whether the Venezuelan, which is an opposition to the law, focused on the illegal deportation.

Most of the nine fair benches, “evidence” suggested that “evidence”, “April 18 afternoon and even a airport to return an airport to an airport to an airport and subsequent aerial airport).”

The courts claimed to have a fee for weight to ensure “irreparable damage” and their jurisdiction in the case. Otherwise, they pointed that a deportation could put the migrants under the hand.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh, instead of providing the application to the Supreme Court, for example, a step in the Supreme Court to make a final and forced decision, went one step one step.

“Conditions call on an emergency and final resolution that could be provided by the court,” he agreed with the decision of the majority.

Thomas and Alito claimed that they were opposed, the Supreme Court did not give a lot to a lower case for the ambulance of the ambulance.

After the verdict, Trump, most of the Supreme Court said the truths that said that the most likely supposed to migrants.

“The Supreme Court does not allow us to receive criminals from our country!” Trump write the first of two consecutive posts.

The second decided on Friday to the sign of “a bad and dangerous day in America.” He complained that “long, stretching and expensive legal process, which confirmed the right to the right process, will result in many years.

He also claimed that the Supreme Court prevented the execution of the executive authority.

“The Supreme Court of the United States does not allow me to do what I have been elected,” he said writeTo imagine a situation that extended deportation hearings will cause the “Bedlam” in the United States.

His leadership has long been accused of interference in its agenda. However, critics, Trump’s actions, especially in court, they warned the decisions of the court, the United States warned the constitutional inspections system and remains.

After the verdict, the American Civil Memories Union (ACLU) appreciated the court’s decision as a literal against human rights violations.

“The decision to remove the court is a strong rebuke to the government’s attempts to go a to a Gulag-type prison in El Salvador“He said Lee Gelernt, Deputy Director of Aclu’s Immigrants Rights.

“The use of a war of war in the competent period increases issues of deep importance, even due to the necessary time.”

The Supreme Court currently has a guarantor and a guard based on the three left.

Among them were appointed by Trump himself. With the majority of those three.