The US Supreme Court provides access to DOGE in Sensitive Social Security Data | Donald Trump News

The Supreme Court of the United States, the President Donald Trump had to enter two cases and enters on government records.

On Friday, the conservative majority of six people canceled the decision of a limited court of information types Government Efficiency Department (DOGE) can log in through the Social Security Administration (SSA).

In a separate situation, the majority, the DOGE decided not to be delivered to the DOGE LEAP (FOIA), Information Act (FOIA).

In both cases, the three left-handed justice of the Supreme Court – Sonia Sotomayor, Ketanji Brown Jackson and Elena Kagan – opposed the decision of the majority.

Doge was at the beginning of the Trump’s campaign to cut the federal government again and cut the bureaucratic Bloocratic Bloat.

Keyboard Eight days after Trump’s re-election on November 13, Doge was designed for “demolish government bureaucracy, cutting the rules, wasting costs and reconstruction”.

Initially, it was not known how to interact with the Doge’s executive branch: a counseling panel, as well as non-governmental or non-governmental.

But January 20, when Trump swears for the second term declared The existing US digital service – a technology initiative established by the former President Barack Obama – will be reorganized to create a DOG.

The government’s efficiency panel has since today called on the federal government to overhaul, mass work, and to close the subjects such as the International Development Agency (USAID).

In addition, many of these claims have been conflicted or questioned or questioned or questioned or questioned or questioned or questioned or questioned or questioned or questioned or questioned by journalists and experts.

In addition, the change in the Federal Government of the DOGE asked him to criticize him and the issue of concern, especially sensitive information and systems.

Until last week, Doge, Trump’s re-election proposal was a prominent billionaire and technological entrepreneur of Elon Musk, a billionaire and technological entrepreneur. Musk and Trump, there was public torn Like the “special state worker” until the end of the billionaire’s light in the White House.

Induced the future of the falling Doge.

To access social security information

One of the controversial initiatives of the DoGe also gave him a boost Log in to Social Security Dataon behalf of tune waste, fraud and abuse.

In the second period of Trump, both President and Musk were repeated Invalid claims Social security payments were made to millions of people listed as 150 years or older. However, the fact of the fact that the checkerboard refuted this claim quickly.

Instead, the Social Security Administration focused on applying a code to automatically stop the payments and automatically stops anyone who is 115 years old.

In the social security system, the incomplete entrances of Cobol programming language flags also noted that the incomplete entrances will want the confusion of Trump management. According to the General Report of the 2024 Inspector, less than 1 percent of social security payments were wrong.

Again, Trump officials criticized the Social Security Department, and called “all the time the biggest ponzi scheme” and eliminated him.

In March, the US district judge Ellen Lipton Holland prevents the DOGE, referring to the sensitive nature of such information, the ability to access social security information.

For example, social security numbers are the key to verify a person’s identity in the United States, and the release of such numbers can lead to individual privacy.

Lipton Holland, DoGe’s Dogin did not show or even indicated or expressed a reason for unlimited access to all record systems of the SSA’s record systems. Why did the DoGe asked why “more appropriate” approach.

“Instead, the government is simply repeating the incantation of the need to modernize the system and modernize the fraud.” “For this, its method is Tantamount to fly with a sledgehammer.”

The judge’s verdict, DOGE allowed anonymous information to appear without identifying.

Nevertheless, the referee Lipton Hollandy’s judge entrusted the authority of Lipton Hollandy’s DoGe’s entry into the entrance to the Supreme Court made this decision.

The Supreme Court filed an ambulance application on Friday, Lipton Hollander lifted the temporary restrictions on the unsigned decision of the information.

But justice brown brown Jackson was given an opposition to a blistering (Pdf), The Supreme Court offers to break the norms to help a president who did not want legal difficulties playing in sub-courts.

“Once again, this court uses the emergency gear to the incident, and instead of turning it off, instead of fan the flames,” said Brown Jackson.

If the DoGe is temporarily blocked from accessing social security information, the Trump management claimed that no “irreparable loss”.

However, by providing an ambulance to the Trump Administration, the court said that the court said that the trial is a serious judicial court decision and serious privacy risks.

Doe subordinate to the laws of transparency?

The second Supreme Court decision was on Friday, Doge’s desire to deliver documents for the federal transparency law.

The question was removed in Washington’s responsibility and ethics of citizens, government guards, as part of the lawsuit brought by citizens.

This claims that the sweeping powers of the cake claimed that it was exposed to laws such as FOIA as any other executive agency. However, the staff also claimed that uncertainty covering the structures of the DoGe was insulated by the outsider.

“The existing information was exposed to Foia, Doge said that the lack of clarification of Doge is clearly a question that is clearly asking,” he said. statement.

The guard group wanted to force the DOG to inform about the internal affairs.

Although the US district judge passed the crew in April, the Supreme Court suspended the decision of the Supreme Court on Friday (Pdf). The court decision appealed to the court for the next review with the instructions to narrow in order.

“Any inquiries to be an agency for the purpose of the enterprise’s freedom of information, the enterprise cannot be convinced,” the conservative majority of the Supreme Court reigns.

The courts also said that “internal” executive communication should be “respect and restraint.”