Tornado Cash Made Crypto Anonymous. Now One of Its Creators Faces Trial

A large part of the court, law experts, tornado will be used for cash, and it claims that the stolen funds are used and it will not know whether the work is violated, and claims that prosecutors.

The defender will never use the developers to use the tornado cash to make it fraudulent, Cohen. “The prosecutor’s office should say that he should be recognized, but they stuck their heads in the sand,” he says.

The jury will also be presented with conflicting ideas because the tornado cash is built and employed, which the storm may be required to comply with the rules and other developers.

Government prosecutors compete Whether the tornado refuses to control the main code of cash, it was effectively managed as another profit business. The indictment claims that the storm is operating a money transfer, which can determine the information about users who abuse the income of cybercrime.

Meanwhile, there is defense stressed many times Distance between the storm and the transactions passing in the tornado cash. Although the developers manage an optional user interface, they have been the funds of users, and they sign. The supporters of the storm claim that the interpretation of the government’s money transfer law is without a precedent.

“If you publish a program protocol for personal operations with their own names, we have left our country in this country in this country,” Peter Van Valkenburgh, Crypto lawyers claimed at the Nonprofit Coin Center.

A guilty judgment, storm, intended, can be engaged in a potentially deadly blow with a violent blow in cryptational circles to develop free peers from the mediators. “If I lose, Defi dies with me,” said June X Post. “The desire for financial freedom, the fact that the code I trust is to go to the darkness.”

Spillover effects can be even more, others argued, resulting in the result of the whole program development industry. “It is a referendum to publish the program. It is wider than Defi,” Van Valkenburgh claims. “Sanctions are a referendum that you can perform the functions of a program developer and communication for unlimited criminal liability for money laundering and unlicensed money transfer.”

If the storm is responsible for abusing the Tornado cash cash by illegal actors, how active is active and responsible for the Linux operating system or responsible for the criminal activity for the criminal activity for WhatsApp?

In case of a sinful judgment, these arguments have a high probability that the courts of appeal. Supporters of more than one storm, instead of judges instead of judges, they say it is instructed to give a cold and meaningless judgment in the application of the law.

“If the government’s theory is properly rejected by the courts, if not by the jury, Chervinsky claims. “The Supreme Court of the United States may be the place where we end.”

In turn, the storm cut a decisive and impossible number as the test date approaches. “My actions do not regret it.” Last interview With cryptovernment in the American podcast. “I wouldn’t change anything I did.”