Trump did not start the war against the poor – but it brings him to his new Donald Trump

“A budget is a moral document” because as many human rights activists have said in decades. If this is true, the so-called “a large, beautiful law” represents an example of an immorality of the US leadership in 2025.

During the next decade, Medicare and Medicaid is a budget that scattered $ 930 billion in $ 930 billion and go up to 17 million without health insurance. Additional Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) – A food aid scheme for Americans living in deep poverty – will include about 1 million sensitive people for the main human rights to avoid hungry. The US Social Welfare system – the Social Security Law and President Lyndon B Johnson, President Franklin and Congress to the emergency room, which is familiar with Medicare and Medicaid in 1965.

This is one of the most steepest role in social prosperity programs in the United States since the beginning of 1935. Many will relate to it Project 2025. However, the United States has always participated in the United States – because millions of Americans who have to work on the United States can not be the United States, so several people can come to the wealth and strength and mega-corporations back up.

A medium-temperature system for the last 90 years of the United States is not something of a miracle. Most of the Western world and other major empires, or in the early 19th and 20th century or modernized, the United States continued with the intervention of the US citizens. Only radicals within the US Labor Movement usually defended the policy of national social welfare. Until the great depression of the 1930s, only individual states – not the federal government – provides limited economic relaxation to unemployed or families.

US employee Frances Perkins played a critical role in persuading the Rooseveltin poster to chase what the 1935 social security law will be. Once applicable, these were the only mothers and federal assistance with the elderly, unemployed, disabled staff and federal assistance. However, both the bill is responsible for the federal government for Americans, even unemployment, even 25 percent.

Ford Motor Company founder Leading Job Talgrounds as Henry Ford, expressed their contempt for the federal social well-being. “No government can guarantee security. This can only be taxed, distributed and serve and gradually shaken to gradually pay taxes,” he said. In 1936, Alf Landon, who served as the Governor of Kansas and Roosevelt, opposed social security law, opposed the Social Security Law that said the tax burden was poorer. “I do not exaggerate the stupidity of this legislation. Those who save our employees are afraid that the federal government will have affected social security funds to pay for other projects.

Although the Congress has applied a social security law in August 1935, the concessions were made to further restricting the provision of racial, women or social welfare. Legislation, the bill was excluded from the employees of honor, non-profit and government employees, non-profit and government workers, non-profit and government workers and waiters. The original legislation made changes in the 1950s to correct some of the racial, sexual and class discrimination.

In 1964-65, Johnson’s war resisted and helped to catalyze a new conservative action. Johnson, Medicare and Medicaid to add to social security regime, women, babies and children (WIC) and Snap (first food stamps) and dependent children (AfDCs) wanted to expand the help of families. Republican and future US President George HW Bush, failed for the Senate in Texas in 1964, a Pro-Medicare Democrats called on the “Socialized Medicine” plan for the “Publicized Medicine” plan. Race Segregationist Strom Thurmond, in general and Johnson’s Medicare and Medicare plans and Medicare plans and Medicar plans, (poor), there is a little bit of excuse to give up a little poverty or extend the federal assistance in the future.

All conservatives against the rights of the Republicans “Rights” grew the expansion of the state of welfare under Johnson. Ronald Reagan became President in 1981 “His leadership crashed Medicaid expenses are more than 18 percent, and a total of 25 percent increased. a study.

I can speak directly through the influence of such cuts. In the New York City territory, I can say that AfDC and Snap in the good years (in 1984) feel like a teenage recipient (under the age of five in 1984) – a $ 16,000 in 1983 and 1987. This difficulty coated apartment offered minimal healthcare through extremely public clinics and still left us without food every month. If this is what they call it “legal”, so I almost did not have anything.

In the last 30 years, leaders who opposed the Federal Social Welfare Office noted the victory by heartburning. The Leader of the Senate Bob Dole was in 1995, “We were fighting with Medicare, fighting Medicare … because we knew he would not work in 1965,” he said. During the 2008 presidential campaign, the late Republican Senator John McCain offered a large “overhaul of social security for balancing the federal budget. Financial Conservative Grover Borquist, “Subject programs” (public welfare programs) said that we would like us to be able to drown it in the bathtub. ” US Dynamics Mike Johnson claimed that the last week’s Trump’s budget will be “in the new gold”. Something is not a terrible thing, which is a terrible thing that harms the budget priorities, and forcing people’s access to health care or medical care.

Ninety years – and 44 years of tax breaks later – conservatives and most right, still a tax discounts that prefer Uber Various and Mega-corporations. Once upon a time, those who give several social security and the new transaction period will try to connect the remains of the Swiss-Cheese Safety Network.

The views shown in this article are unique and definitely reflect the editorial position of Gazir.