Upper candidates speak fossil fossils as a climate diary

As a threat of US President Donald Trump, Canada’s federal election agenda was mainly shadowed by the country’s contribution to global warming.

The two main candidates are pushing plans for new energy infrastructure, as the country moves away from trust in the United States.

Mark Carney’s liberals promise to make global super power in both conventional and green energy in Canada. Under Pierre Poilievre, conservatives want to revive the oil and gas sector and break the industry carbon tax.

When the environment is overlapping the voters list, it is a great transition from the 2021 elections.

This voting was a consensus on the transfer of Canada’s rapidly to the Green Economy, and the transfer of the transition to several major economies accepted in June.

This feeling of unity has already gone long.

At the beginning of March, Carney, the leader of the Liberal and Prime Minister, has a long trace record as the champion of international climate change.

Along with a governor of England, it was a special envoy on climate and finance and finance and the co-chair of the Glasgow Financial Alliance, one of the great results of COP26.

However, as the Prime Minister, the first action was to cancel the consumer carbon harvest.

Tax – Referee Liberals signature climate policy – used in 2019 and placed additional payments to consumers using coal, oil or gas products.

It was not popular and has become an easy target for the growing value of living in recent years for conservatives. Poilievre even tried to paint his opponent as “Carbon Tax Carney”.

Some observers believe the abolition of the tax is a smart political action and others feel that others feel wrong.

“With the removal of one of your first action, the policy of climate change is not good for us, which is not good for us, in fact, this is the director of the Center for International Climate and a member of the Net Zero Advisor of the Canada, Catherine Abreu.

“I think there is an opportunity to build a new narrative base around it here in the election.”

Carney’s energy section is to enter the Canada “in leading super power in both clean and ordinary energy” Canada.

He emphasizes the pragmatic approach and talks about the promotion of green energy projects and green transport and buildings without informing a large number of information. He called on to invest in technologies such as carbon capture.

There are other important factors that helped CARNEY climate rhetoric cool.

Feedback surveys show that from late 2023, Canada, concerns on the climate, fell as a concern in the face of growing prices, energy and housing expenses.

The war in Ukraine also emphasizes the effective natural resources of the country in oil, gas and critical minerals.

“We returned to the door of our gate, we had a parade of geopolitical allies, we want your rocks, Canada will be a secure source of commodity in Russia’s spot,” said Mark Winfield, Toronto University at the Faculty of Environmental and City Change.

“And this is another dynamic in all this in the previous elections.”

Pierre Poilievre is a man who wants to replace Carney as evening.

“The cost of residential issues and the law and the law and the law and the defense of harsh policies and” wake up “cultural issues” woken up. “

Poilievre, a strong base of power in the country’s energy-rich regions of the country, pushes the great expansion of the oil and gas industry and the extradition of carbon taxes in the industry.

After the Canadian Network supported Zero targets, India and other Asian countries claimed to be better with “dirty coal” better with “dirty coal” better.

According to Prof Winfield, conservative proposals to increase oil and gas are attractive to voters, despite the nature of expanding production.

It is more important to the BBC, “the climate and in response to Trump, unlike any real thinking that it is in fact economically effective

Regardless of climate or energy, the main question in the minds of voters in this election is the best side of the US president.

This is especially important when it comes to the oil and gas industry.

Canada’s largest foreign oil supplier, the impact of energy tariffs in southern routine production can be catastrophic for work and economy.

“Our relations with the United States have changed completely,” Carney said last week from the first of the two election debates.

“Pipelines are a national security problem for us.”

This concerned about the US dependence, this was interested in the pipelines, which could be exported from Western provinces, mainly to Western provinces, mainly in the east, to new foreign markets.

An attempt named Energy East Pipeline, in 2017, including a number of factors, including some regions of the country and regulatory obstacles, were treated for violent opposition.

In this campaign, both liberal and conservatives were Carney, and “Energy Corridors” promised to watch the rapidly He was supported for pipelines, knowing they are deeply popular with ecologists.

Defense from Trump between the Canadian Defense is a nation to defend as a threatening nation and walking on a warming climate.

The Canadian Insurance Bureau said in 2024 in the air-related insured losses 8.5 billion dollars ($ 6.1.6.6 pounds) and third for 2023.

Two election fonstunners play a major role in Canada fossil fossil fossil fossil fossil fossil fossil fossil fossil fossil fossil fossils will take place with the country’s climate commitments.

Yves-François Blanchet, the leader of the Federal Party, located in Quebec, accused the couple in a pair of “rejection of climate change”.

“I apologize for killing your party, but you say their tales” tales “tales,” he said in the discussions of last week.

Canada is on the international stage in 2005 due to the level of 40-45% of carbon waste in 2030.

Since 2023, the carbon output was only 8.5% lower.

Who wins the election will be a real problem for this circle square.

Canadians go to the boxes on April 28.