Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Polymarket did not respond to a request for comment.
Polymarket starting in 2020 to rise to the acquittal Last year, as a way to bet the US presidential election. Polymarket and his lawyers during the election period Pitched forecast markets As a superior method for predicting results than traditional elections – more efficient “the source of truth.“However, this proposal was protested by the Zelensky costume.
“Everyone knows the answer, but the system is currently being broken,” he said. “This is a fucked situation.”
Polymarket reserves the right to cancel UMA outcome. Company last year Uma voting In a bet on the Trump-themed Cryptocurrency project in Barron Trump. Then polymarket Returned bettors and clearly described UMA’s result as “wrong”. The company did not step every time. In March, a $ 7 million bet was a contract with Ukraine and the United States on mineral access Solved prematurely with the wrong result. In the course of time, the affected users, a disapproving message addressed to the Polymarket employee He called him “an unprecedented situation But he said he would not return bettors.
Polymarket users who are affected by the probable result of the Zelensky Predictionary market, fight against the polymarket and UMA, fight against the messenger platform to potentially coordinate an answer.
“I intend to join the law,” he says that at a stage, $ 300,000 in a stage will earn $ 300,000 without responding to some funds in response to confusion. “I saw moral damage over this debace and the additional context made me a lot of stress.”
People in UMA’s argument in the channel of Disagreement spread with the members of the community that accused each other of “backchannel deals” and cheaters. Some look at it as a referendum that does not open in the whole project. “This is not just a vote in a suit – this is a member who voted for the future of UMA.
The last resolution is expected on July 8.
“There is no evidence of UMA manipulation. I do not like this indecent charges,” Lambur said, Telli said. “After the dust is located in a market or not in this suit, I am waiting for a productive conversation about development and design.”
Others accepts such disagreement as a natural part of the process: “For me, it was a jacket that seems like a suit, but looks like a suit.” “This debate simply reflects the fact that the truth is complicated and different from one person.”
All this heat comes from a critical mother for polymarket in the middle of an aggressive stock gam, led by Peter Thiel’s Foundation Foundation; Reuters, forecast market will be evaluated $ 1 billion. It is not an ideal time for the integrity of Özga for aliening some of some active users or for the integrity of markets. “The silence in the polymarket was a carpet,” he says Defipolice.
