What did India and Pakistan won – and lost – in military status? | News of India-Pakistan Tensions

Islamabad, Pakistan – Four days later a 10 May ceasefire Days who rapidly increase military tension, with each country with each country, a narration war with each country, a narrative war in the country, spoke of a Pakistani war.

The militants erupted after 26 civilians in Pahalgam in April 26, India in India. India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi has rejected any role in the attack on Pakistan, but he promised revenge.

After a number of titles between neighbors, after diplomatic measures, the tensions exploded in a military. On the morning of May 7, India fired only by Pakistan’s Pakistan’s Pakistan’s Pakistani province of Pakistani, but in four parts of Pakistan, but in four parts of “terrorist”.

In the coming days, both sides hit each other in each other’s territory and blamed each other to start attacks.

The tensions rose to the summit on Saturday, India and Pakistan fired missiles on each other’s military bases. India is the headquarters of the Pakistani Army, including Garronpindi, the headquarters of the Pakistani Army headquarters, including Garrison, the headquarters of the Pakistan Army, are Garrison, a headquarters of the Pakistan Army, the headquarters of the Pakistani army. Pakistan’s missiles, India and India targeted military facilities on the country’s border, hit at least four facilities.

Then, for the general war between the world’s nuclear armed neighbors, US President Donald Trump declared a ceasefire claimed by the United States. Pakistan has thanked the United States, and even India has been made without a third party intervention by two neighbors alone to refute the decision to stop fighting.

Since the announcement, both countries held news conferences that present the “evidence of achievements”. Monday, high-level military officials in India and Pakistan, spoke on the phone to protect the ceasefire in the coming days.

However, the analysts say no side is actually created from the crisis from the crisis of April 22. Instead, both India and Pakistan can also require strategic gains as each casualties.

International Kashmir: Pakistan’s profit

Last week, the military confrontation is a dispute in the Kashmir region of two countries between the four war between India and Pakistan.

Pakistan and India manage various parts of Kashmir, along with China, who managed two narrow strips. India claims all of Kashmir, and Pakistan claims the part of India – but Islamabad’s ally is not in China, but manages.

Bangladesh, in 1971, in 1971, which caused the establishment of New Delhi and Islamabad, did not to resolve “disagreements through bilateral negotiations.”

Since then, since the Indian Kashmir dispute and other tensions between neighbors can be solved only without bilateral, third-party intervention. At the same time, Pakistan decided to call for the United Nations to play a role in pushing a solution to the global community.

On Sunday, Trump said that the United States is ready to help mediate a resolution on Kashmir dispute. “I will work with both of you, a solution of a solution, a solution related to Kashmir,” he said.

London’s senior teacher in the Royal College, London’s senior teacher Walter Ladwig, the last confrontation has long been the opportunity to internationalize the issue of Kashmir, which has long been a long-term goal.

“Islamabad has accepted the mediation from a number of countries, including a number of countries, as a result of evidence the need for the ceasefire,” said Ladwig Al Jazer.

In contrast, India had to accept the ceasefire instead of the conflict, instead of ending their terms.

The Diplomat magazine, South Asian editor, Sudha Ramachandran, Modi’s military operation in India can also be lost in a ceasefire.

“The Nationalist Sahin was able to collect points among the base of the support. But the ceasefire did not go well between the hards,” Ramachandran said.

To emphasize ‘terrorism’: India’s gain

However, the analysts also helped India as the trigger in the form of tension and Pahalgam attack last week.

“Diplomatic, India, India called on the bodies of Pakistan, to take international actions, Islamabad’s meaningful actions and meaningful measures,” said Ladwig.

He called “Pakistan for Pakistan) again,” For Pakistan), which is associated with the land-working groups.

“When Islamabad calls on the participation of the participation and neutral research, the burden of evidence in international forums is increasingly reducing Pakistan to demonstrate proactive anti-terrorist efforts,” Ladwig added.

India has been accused of financing Pakistan, supporting Kashmir’s separation from India, for a long time for the training and shelter armed groups. Pakistan insists that Kashmir’s separatist movement has given only diplomatic and moral support.

The downput of planes can be Pakistan’s gain

India claimed that the holidays on May 7 were more than 100 “terrorists”. Pakistan said that there were mosques and residential areas of Indian missiles, and 40 civilians, including children, but also killed children, other than 11 military personnel.

Islamabad also claimed that he had answered fighter jets and brought more than one Indian planes.

India has neither confirmed or denied these claims, but Pakistan’s servicemen shared their saying that they have identified the shot planes. French and US officials have confirmed that at least one Rafale and a Russian-made jet is lost by India.

Indian officials also confirmed that at least two plane crashes in the Indian management area, but did not clarify which country.

Both India and Pakistan say that there are no borders of any side planes, and the presence of garbage in an Indian area is India, says analysts.

After that, a large companion in the center of the century, Pakistan, Asfandyar Mir, Washington, DC, Al A.Renter explained. “In particular, he confirmed that the plane was approved by various independent sources. Thus, (Pakistan) can see the ceasefire is better to strengthen the dividend.”

AZERMAND and security analyst in Azam University in Islamabad Mohamed Shoaib is called a strategic incorrect calculation against Pakistan. “Pakistan’s ability to retreat was defected,” he said.

Ludwig said that there would be a mistake to overcome the importance of the success of any possible Pakistan, which is possible. “These are the best, symbolic victories. They do not represent a clear or unequivocal military profit.”

It can then be the Gainer of India

In many ways, analysts say that more fleshy military achievements were in India.

In addition to Pakistan-driven Kashmir, in addition to Kashmir and Muzaffarabad, May 7 targeted the fourth place in the economic nerve center, Punjab, Pakistan, Punjab, Pakistan.

During the next two days, India, as well as the drones in the territory of Pakistan, as well as the large Pakistani population centers such as Lahore and Karachi, reached deep.

And on May 10, Indian missiles hit Pakistan’s three Pakistani aircraft in Pakistan’s Pakistan’s window, which is higher than Pakistan’s Indian bases.

It just showed that India is greater accessible than Pakistan. It was the first time since 1971, when he managed to hit India’s Punjab.

Only the control line is the De-Facto border in Kashmir, but the deeply of Pakistan is the main goal of India. India has achieved this.

Ludwig also represented the success of the Pakistani defense position in the Pakistan’s defense position in Ludwig.

Will he hold a ceasefire?

Military officials of both countries speaking on Monday and consenting to the ceasefire, as well as agreed to take immediate steps to reduce the participation of troops along the borders. The second round of the talks is expected in 48 hours.

But then then, Indian Prime Minister Modi The battles were simply “destroyed”.

Still, Stimson Center believes that the MIR can hold the ceasefire.

“Both sides faces restrictions and opportunities that have a ceasefire on the balance, which arose during the last week,” he said.

Ladwig, reflecting this appearance, but did not solve the tension that causes the trial to the crisis, said the exacerbation reflects the mutual interest.

“India has significantly changed the rules of the game in this episode. The Government of India seems to be completely distributed to Islamabad and Ravalpindi to allow acceptable revenge related to anti-Indian terrorist groups,” he said.

“The Pakistani government and military seem to be a key factor to determine how strong the ceasefire will be with groups in the land.”

Shoaib, a research companion at George Mason University in the United States of Quaid-i-Azam University, stressed the importance of continuous dialogue.

He warned peace protection of both India managed Kashmir and Pakistan’s security dynamics in the Balochistan province.

As in accusations supporting Pakistan supporting Pakistani supporting Pakistani separatism of India, Islamabad claims that it is supported by a separatist rebellion in Balochistan and denied India.

“Any subsequent violence has the potential to be bloody and more widespread,” he said. “Both sides can cause significant damage to urban populations without going to the charm war and gain nothing from the conflict.”