Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
In conversations about Israel and Palestine, I often ask my views on the internal resistance to the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Questions pointed to hundreds of thousands of Israelis to protest against the government in the last two years, and in the end of the power of Netanyahu, ask this effort on these efforts.
My answer is simple – the real problem of Israel is not its current government. The government may fall, but not much to change the nature of the regime, not much can change, and in particular is not related to the main rights of the Palestinians. The decision of the Supreme Court of Israel hit my opinion.
On March 18, 2024, Israel filed an urgent application under the Israeli court, and the Israeli government and the army of the Israeli government and the international humanitarian law in Gaza were asked to resolve the humanitarian needs of the civilian population in Gaza.
The application was presented at a time when the assistance was entered in Gaza, but the amount passing the border was quite far enough to meet the minimal needs of the population, 75 percent of them were already displaced. Law groups asked the government, especially in the north, especially north, especially in the nutrition and dehydration of children, especially in the transition to Gaza.
For more than a year that the court has been more than a year that the government has been over a year. Three weeks after the law groups applying the application, the Court gathered only to ensure the government’s additional time to update the initial response to the application. This determined its tone on how the application would continue for the next 12 months.
Each time the applicants had a deterioration of the civilian population and the court’s urgent need, the court asked the court after the court. In the April 17 update, for example, the government has significantly increased the number of trucks in Gaza between 202, 2023 and 12 April 2024, 2024, allowed to pass the number 2263. Today, 121 trucks in this day are not approaching to meet the needs of the population for every humanitarian agency working in Gaza.
In October 2024, at least half a year after the application was presented at least a-half years, law enforcement agencies asked the court to be ordered after the government after the government during two weeks. In response, the government claimed that he was closely following the situation in the northern Gaza and “lack of food.” In two months, the government acknowledged the number of Palestinian residents who trapped in the northern Gaza. Thus, the strip does not need to be entered.
On March 18, 2025, Israel violated the ceasefire agreement and violated the bombing of the Gaza and the Minister of Energy and Infrastructure has suspended power supply of power, and applicants demanded another urgent request for the temporary order to prevent the government’s humanitarian assistance. However, the court could not decide.
Finally, on March 27, after year, the law made the application of the application and decided. Chief Justice Yitzhak Amit and Courts Noam Sohlberg and David Mintz was unanimously unfolded. Justice David Mintz characterizes Israel’s attacks as a war of divine duty, and the humanitarian aid of humanitarian aid of humanitarian aid to humanitarian aid humanitarian aid humanitarian aid humanitarian aid humanitarian aid They accepted the risk of using his aid to fight Israel. “
Thus, humanitarian agencies ignored the pity and repeated the critical situation of humanitarian agencies and the trial of the trial, and to avoid preventing the civilian population of the civilian population, as well as preventing the civilian population. In fact, the court legalized the use of hunger as a weapon of war.
This is the court where hundreds of thousands of Israel are trying to escape. The Judicial Court of 27 – Almost all other sentences with the involvement of the Palestinians is the colonial trial of the Israeli Supreme Court – the rights of the IDP population, the rights, and terrible violence against the legal Palestinians. Although the Supreme Court can reflect the values of the existing government, especially the issues related to political corruption – undoubtedly reflect and reflect the values of the colonial regime.
Thus, the liberal Zionists who filled the streets of Tel Aviv every weekend pose a threat to Jewish democracy, not against the judiciary of democracy. The fewer part of these protesters have a terrible government on humanitarian aid, or a realistic dmil that the trial is consistently developed the Israeli apartheid and column columns. In other words, the regime may continue to eliminate Palestinians unimpeded until the rights of the Israeli Jewish citizen.
The views shown in this article are unique and definitely reflect the editorial position of Gazir.
